24 C.F.R. § 990.110

Operating fund formula

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General formula. (1) The amount of annual contributions (operating subsidy) each PHA is eligible to receive under this part shall be determined by a formula.

(2) In general, operating subsidy shall be the difference between formula expense and formula income. If a PHA's formula expense is greater than its formula income, then the PHA is eligible for an operating subsidy.

(3) Formula expense is an estimate of a PHA's operating expense and is determined by the following three components: Project Expense Level (PEL), Utility Expense Level (UEL), and other formula expenses (add-ons). Formula expense and its three components are further described in subpart C of this part. Formula income is an estimate for a PHA's non-operating subsidy revenue and is further described in subpart D of this part.

(4) Certain portions of the operating fund formula (e.g., PEL) are calculated in terms of per unit per month (PUM) amounts and are converted into whole dollars by multiplying the PUM amount by the number of eligible unit months (EUMs). EUMs are further described in subpart B of this part.

(b) Specific formula. (1) A PHA's formula amount shall be the sum of the three formula expense components calculated as follows: {[(PEL multiplied by EUM) plus (UEL multiplied by EUM) plus add-ons] minus (formula income multiplied by EUM)}.

(2) A PHA whose formula amount is equal to or less than zero is still eligible to receive operating subsidy equal to its most recent actual audit cost for its Operating Fund Program.

(3) Operating subsidy payments will be limited to the availability of funds as described in § 990.210(c).

(c) Non-codified formula elements. This part defines the major components of the Operating Fund Formula and describes the relationships of these various components. However, this part does not codify certain secondary elements that will be used in the revised Operating Fund Formula. HUD will more appropriately provide this information in non-codified guidance, such as a Handbook, Federal Register notice, or other non-regulatory means that HUD determines appropriate.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1988–2019 · leading case: Pub. Hous. Authorities Directors Ass'n v. United States, 130 Fed. Cl. 522 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
Pub. Hous. Authorities Directors Ass'n v. United States, 130 Fed. Cl. 522 (Fed. Cl. 2017). · cites it 2× “Availability of Funds The government’s final argument is that language at 24 C.F.R. § 990.110 (b)(3), which states that “[ojperating subsidy payments will be limited to the availability of funds as described in § 990.”
Hous. Auth. of the Cnty. of King v. Pierce, 701 F. Supp. 844 (D.D.C. 1988). · cites it 3× “Dorsey, the recapture would occur pursuant to the authority granted HUD under 24 C.F.R. § 990.110 (e). That provision allows HUD to adjust the annual subsidy of a public housing authority either upward or downward “as a result of data subsequently available to HUD which alters…”
Hous. Auth. of Cnty. of King v. Pierce, 711 F. Supp. 19 (D.D.C. 1989). “, but pursuant to 24 C.F.R. § 990.110 (e), which, according to HUD, “authorizes downward adjustments in the amount of operating subsidy.”
Comm. for Fairness v. Kemp, 791 F. Supp. 888 (D.D.C. 1992). “The fact that HUD had the power to make readjustments pursuant to 24 C.F.R. § 990.110 (e) does not, as HUD now suggests, change the pattern of an evaluation from information available with respect to income at the beginning of the year to one available at the end of the year.”
San Antonio Hous. Auth. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2019). · cites it 4× “The applicable Section 9 operating subsidy formula established by the Secretary of HUD, currently codified at 24 C.F.R. § 990.110 (2018), calculates, on an individual project1 level basis, the difference between 1A “project” is defined as a “public housing building or set of…”
Pub. Hous. Authorities Directors Ass'n v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2017). · cites it 2× “11 The Court notes that 24 C.F.R. § 990.110 (c) states that “this part does not codify certain secondary elements that will be used in the revised Operating Fund Formula,” and 13 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the government contends that HUD’s failure to comply with Title 24…”
Weeks v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2019). “24 C.F.R. § 990.110 (a)(2), (b)(3). Formula income is an estimate of the public housing authority’s income exclusive of any operating subsidy—i.”
— 24 C.F.R. § 990.110(c) — 1 case
Pub. Hous. Authorities Directors Ass'n v. United States, 130 Fed. Cl. 522 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “Availability of Funds The government’s final argument is that language at 24 C.F.R. § 990.110 (b)(3), which states that “[ojperating subsidy payments will be limited to the availability of funds as described in § 990.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.