C.F.R. » Title 25 » CHAPTER VI—OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY, INDIAN AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › PART 1000—ANNUAL FUNDING AGREEMENTS UNDER THE TRIBAL SELF-GOVERNMENT ACT AMENDMENTS TO THE INDIAN SELF-DETERMINATION AND EDUCATION ACT › Subpart H—Negotiation Process

25 C.F.R. § 1000.1060

What issues must the bureau and the Tribe/Consortium address at negotiation meetings?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The negotiation meetings referred to in § 1000.1055 must address at a minimum the following:

(a) The specific Tribe/Consortium proposal(s) and intentions;

(b) Legal or program issues that the bureau or the Tribe/Consortium identify as concerns;

(c) Options for negotiating programs and related budget amounts, including mutually agreeable options for developing alternative formats for presenting budget information to the Tribe/Consortium;

(d) Dates for conducting and concluding negotiations;

(e) Protocols for conducting negotiations;

(f) Responsibility for preparation of a written summary of the discussions; and

(g) Who will prepare an initial draft of the compact or funding agreement, as applicable.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Osage Nation v. United States Dep't of Interior (D.D.C. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Osage Nation v. United States Dep't of Interior (D.D.C. 2025). “See 25 C.F.R. § 1000.1060 (g). But the main difference between the 2025 regulations and the 2000 regulations as it relates to the negotiation 43 process for AFAs is that the 2025 regulations implement the new “final offer” process described in Section 5366(c) of the ISDEAA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.