25 C.F.R. § 163.12
Harvesting restrictions
(a) Harvesting timber on commercial forest land will not be permitted unless provisions for natural and/or artificial reforestation of acceptable tree species is included in harvest plans.
(b) Clearing of large contiguous areas will be permitted only on land that, when cleared, will be devoted to a more beneficial use than growing timber crops. This restriction shall not prohibit clearcutting when it is silviculturally appropriate, based on ecological principles, to harvest a particular stand of timber by such method and it otherwise conforms with objectives in § 163.3 of this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1992–1994 · leading case: Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp. (In re Blue Lake Forest Prods., Inc.), 30 F.3d 1138 (9th Cir. 1994).
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp. (In re Blue Lake Forest Prods., Inc.), 30 F.3d 1138 (9th Cir. 1994). “25 C.F.R. § 163.12 . Moreover, “[essential departures from the fundamental requirements of standard and approved contract forms shall be made only with the approval of the Secretary.”
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Blue Lake Forest Prods., Inc. (In Re Blue Lake Forest Prods., Inc.), 143 B.R. 563 (N.D. Cal. 1992). “25 CFR 163.12. The Interi- or Department’s published Standard Provisions are part of those approved forms.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.