26 C.F.R. § 1.471-4

Inventories at cost or market, whichever is lower

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In general—(1) Market definition. Under ordinary circumstances and for normal goods in an inventory, market means the aggregate of the current bid prices prevailing at the date of the inventory of the basic elements of cost reflected in inventories of goods purchased and on hand, goods in process of manufacture, and finished manufactured goods on hand. The basic elements of cost include direct materials, direct labor, and indirect costs required to be included in inventories by the taxpayer (e.g., under section 263A and its underlying regulations for taxpayers subject to that section). For taxpayers to which section 263A applies, for example, the basic elements of cost must reflect all direct costs and all indirect costs properly allocable to goods on hand at the inventory date at the current bid price of those costs, including but not limited to the cost of purchasing, handling, and storage activities conducted by the taxpayer, both prior to and subsequent to acquisition or production of the goods. The determination of the current bid price of the basic elements of costs reflected in goods on hand at the inventory date must be based on the usual volume of particular cost elements purchased (or incurred) by the taxpayer.

(2) Fixed price contracts. Paragraph (a)(1) of this section does not apply to any goods on hand or in process of manufacture for delivery upon firm sales contracts (i.e., those not legally subject to cancellation by either party) at fixed prices entered into before the date of the inventory, under which the taxpayer is protected against actual loss. Any such goods must be inventoried at cost.

(3) Examples. The valuation principles in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are illustrated by the following examples:

Example 1.(i) Taxpayer A manufactures tractors. A values its inventory using cost or market, whichever is lower, under paragraph (a)(1) of this section. At the end of 1994, the cost of one of A's tractors on hand is determined as follows:
Direct materials$3,000
Direct labor4,000
Indirect costs under section 263A3,000
Total section 263A costs (cost)$10,000
(ii) A determines that the aggregate of the current bid prices of the materials, labor, and overhead required to reproduce the tractor at the end of 1994 are as follows:
Direct materials$3,100
Direct labor4,100
Indirect costs under section 263A3,100
Total section 263A costs (market)$10,300
(iii) In determining the lower of cost or market value of the tractor, A compares the cost of the tractor, $10,000, with the market value of the tractor, $10,300, in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Thus, under this section, A values the tractor at $10,000.
Example 2.(i) Taxpayer B purchases and resells several lines of shoes and is subject to section 263A. B values its inventory using cost or market, whichever is lower, under paragraph (a)(1) of this section. At the end of 1994, the cost of one pair of shoes on hand is determined as follows:
Acquisition cost$200
Indirect costs under section 263A10
Total section 263A costs (cost)$210
(ii) B determines the aggregate current bid prices prevailing at the end of 1994 for the elements of cost (both direct costs and indirect costs incurred prior and subsequent to acquisition of the shoes) based on the volume of the elements usually purchased (or incurred) by B as follows:
Acquisition cost$178
Indirect costs under section 263A12
Total § 263A costs (market)$190
(iii) In determining the lower of cost or market value of the shoes, B compares the cost of the pair of shoes, $210, with the market value of the shoes, $190, in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. Thus, under this section, B values the shoes at $190.

(b) Inactive markets. Where no open market exists or where quotations are nominal, due to inactive market conditions, the taxpayer must use such evidence of a fair market price at the date or dates nearest the inventory as may be available, such as specific purchases or sales by the taxpayer or others in reasonable volume and made in good faith, or compensation paid for cancellation of contracts for purchase commitments. Where the taxpayer in the regular course of business has offered for sale such merchandise at prices lower than the current price as above defined, the inventory may be valued at such prices less direct cost of disposition, and the correctness of such prices will be determined by reference to the actual sales of the taxpayer for a reasonable period before and after the date of the inventory. Prices which vary materially from the actual prices so ascertained will not be accepted as reflecting the market.

(c) Comparison of cost and market. Where the inventory is valued upon the basis of cost or market, whichever is lower, the market value of each article on hand at the inventory date shall be compared with the cost of the article, and the lower of such values shall be taken as the inventory value of the article.

(d) Effective date. This section applies to inventory valuations for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1993. For taxable years beginning before January 1, 1994, taxpayers must take reasonable positions on their federal income tax returns with respect to the application of section 263A, and must have otherwise complied with § 1.471-4 (as contained in the 26 CFR part 1 edition revised April 1, 1993). For purposes of this paragraph (d), a reasonable position as to the application of section 263A is a position consistent with the temporary regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, notices, and announcements concerning section 263A applicable in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1994. (See § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter.)

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11725, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 8482, 58 FR 42233, Aug. 9, 1993]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases, 1962–2008 · leading case: Rockwell Int'l Corp. v. Comm'r, 77 T.C. 780 (Tax Ct. 1981).
Rockwell Int'l Corp. v. Comm'r, 77 T.C. 780 (Tax Ct. 1981). · cites it 54× “181 did not bar petitioner from using an inventory method of accounting with respect to costs incurred under P.O. 181, the writedown nevertheless failed to meet the requirements of either sec.”
Paccar, Inc. v. Comm'r, 85 T.C. 754 (Tax Ct. 1985). · cites it 12× “The Supreme Court recognized *72 that Thor valued its inventory at the "lower of cost *782 or market" which is an acceptable and normal method of inventory valuation.”
Thor Power Tool Co. v. Comm'r, 64 T.C. 154 (Tax Ct. 1975). · cites it 20× “To prevail in that contention, petitioner must show that its method came within the ambit of section 1.471-2(c) or section 1.”
Sam Goldberger, Inc. v. Comm'r, 88 T.C. 1532 (Tax Ct. 1987). · cites it 10× “Held , although Sam valued the inventory in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, he failed to establish that he valued the inventory in accordance with sec. 1.471-4(b), Income Tax Regs. , and the Commissioner did not abuse his discretion by reducing the cost…”
Primo Pants Co. v. Comm'r, 78 T.C. 705 (Tax Ct. 1982). · cites it 8× “*718 When inventory is valued on the basis of cost or market, whichever is lower, the "market value of each article on hand at the inventory date shall be compared with the cost of the article, and the lower of such values shall be taken as the inventory value of the article.”
Consol. Mfg. v. Comm'r, 111 T.C. 1 (Tax Ct. 1998). · cites it 26× “In other words, just because the costs of the labor and overhead involved here are two of the three basic elements of cost that were reflected in Consolidated's inventories for goods in process and for finished goods, see sec.”
Superior Coach of Florida, Inc. v. Comm'r, 80 T.C. 895 (Tax Ct. 1983). · cites it 8× “Where the inventory is valued according to the lower of cost or market method, the market value of each article on hand at the inventory date is compared with the cost, and the lower of the two values is the amount taken as the inventory value.”
Thor Power Tool Co. v. Comm'r, 439 U.S. 522 (1979). “471-4, 26 CFR § 1.471-4 (1964). That Regulation defines “market” tornean, ordinarily, “the current bid price prevailing at the date of the inventory for the particular merchandise in the volume in which usually purchased by the taxpayer.”
Jostens, Inc. v. Comm'r, 58 T.C.M. 933 (Tax Ct. 1989). · cites it 6× “"Under ordinary circumstances and for normal goods in an inventory, 'market' means the current bid price prevailing at the date of the inventory for the particular merchandise in the volume in which usually purchased by the taxpayer * * *.”
Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Comm'r, 101 T.C. 462 (Tax Ct. 1993). · cites it 4× “Multiplying the number of items in inventory by the value or cost of that item results in the composite concept of inventory -- total inventory. The Supreme Court in Thor Power Tool Co.”
Seawright v. Comm'r, 117 T.C. 294 (Tax Ct. 2001). · cites it 2× “Under this approach, "the market value of each article on hand at the inventory date shall be compared with the cost of the article, and the lower of such values shall be taken as the inventory value of the article." Sec. 1.471-4(c), Income Tax Regs.”
Golden Gate Litho v. Comm'r, 1998 T.C. Memo. 184 (Tax Ct. 1998). · cites it 2× “, provides: Where the inventory is valued upon the basis of cost or market, whichever is lower, the market value of each article on hand at the inventory date shall be compared with the cost of the article, and the lower of such values shall be taken as the inventory value of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.