(a) In general—(1) Adequate stated interest. For purposes of section 483, a contract has unstated interest if the contract does not provide for adequate stated interest. A contract does not provide for adequate stated interest if the sum of the deferred payments exceeds—
(i) The sum of the present values of the deferred payments and the present values of any stated interest payments due under the contract; or
(ii) In the case of a cash method debt instrument (within the meaning of section 1274A(c)(2)) received in exchange for property in a potentially abusive situation (as defined in § 1.1274-3), the fair market value of the property reduced by the fair market value of any consideration other than the debt instrument, and reduced by the sum of all principal payments that are not deferred payments.
(2) Amount of unstated interest. For purposes of section 483, unstated interest means an amount equal to the excess of the sum of the deferred payments over the amount described in paragraph (a)(1)(i) or (a)(1)(ii) of this section, whichever is applicable.
(b) Operational rules—(1) In general. For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, rules similar to those in § 1.1274-2 apply to determine whether a contract has adequate stated interest and the amount of unstated interest, if any, on the contract.
(2) Present value. For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the present value of any deferred payment or interest payment is determined by discounting the payment from the date it becomes due to the date of the sale or exchange at the test rate of interest applicable to the contract in accordance with § 1.483-3.
(c) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this section.
Example 1. Contract that does not have adequate stated interest.On January 1, 1995, A sells B nonpublicly traded property under a contract that calls for a $100,000 payment of principal on January 1, 2005, and 10 annual interest payments of $9,000 on January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 1996. Assume that the test rate of interest is 9.2 percent, compounded annually. The contract does not provide for adequate stated interest because it does not provide for interest equal to 9.2 percent, compounded annually. The present value of the deferred payments is $98,727.69. As a result, the contract has unstated interest of $1,272.31 ($100,000 − $98,727.69).Example 2. Contract that does not have adequate stated interest; no interest for initial short period.On May 1, 1996, A sells B nonpublicly traded property under a contract that calls for B to make a principal payment of $200,000 on December 31, 1998, and semiannual interest payments of $9,000, payable on June 30 and December 31 of each year, beginning on December 31, 1996. Assume that the test rate of interest is 9 percent, compounded semiannually. Even though the contract calls for a stated rate of interest no lower than the test rate of interest, the contract does not provide for adequate stated interest because the stated rate of interest does not apply for the short period from May 1, 1996, through June 30, 1996.Example 3. Potentially abusive situation.(i) Facts. In a potentially abusive situation, a contract for the sale of nonpublicly traded personal property calls for the issuance of a cash method debt instrument (as defined in section 1274A(c)(2)) with a stated principal amount of $700,000, payable in 5 years. No other consideration is given. The debt instrument calls for annual payments of interest over its entire term at a rate of 9.2 percent, compounded annually (the test rate of interest applicable to the debt instrument). Thus, the present value of the deferred payment and the interest payments is $700,000. Assume that the fair market value of the property is $500,000.
(ii) Amount of unstated interest. A cash method debt instrument received in exchange for property in a potentially abusive situation provides for adequate stated interest only if the sum of the deferred payments under the instrument does not exceed the fair market value of the property. Because the deferred payment ($700,000) exceeds the fair market value of the property ($500,000), the debt instrument does not provide for adequate stated interest. Therefore, the debt instrument has unstated interest of $200,000.
Example 4. Variable rate debt instrument with adequate stated interest; variable rate as of the issue date greater than the test rate.(i) Facts. A contract for the sale of nonpublicly traded property calls for the issuance of a debt instrument in the principal amount of $75,000 due in 10 years. The debt instrument calls for interest payable semiannually at a rate of 3 percentage points above the yield on 6-month Treasury bills at the mid-point of the semiannual period immediately preceding each interest payment date. Assume that the interest rate is a qualified floating rate and that the debt instrument is a variable rate debt instrument within the meaning of § 1.1275-5.
(ii) Adequate stated interest. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, rules similar to those in § 1.1274-2(f) apply to determine whether the debt instrument has adequate stated interest. Assume that the test rate of interest applicable to the debt instrument is 9 percent, compounded semiannually. Assume also that the yield on 6-month Treasury bills on the date of the sale is 8.89 percent, which is greater than the yield on 6-month Treasury bills on the first date on which there is a binding written contract that substantially sets forth the terms under which the sale is consummated. Under § 1.1274-2(f), the debt instrument is tested for adequate stated interest as if it provided for a stated rate of interest of 11.89 percent (3 percent plus 8.89 percent), compounded semiannually, payable over its entire term. Because the test rate of interest is 9 percent, compounded semiannually, and the debt instrument is treated as providing for stated interest of 11.89 percent, compounded semiannually, the debt instrument provides for adequate stated interest.
(d) Effective date. This section applies to sales and exchanges that occur on or after April 4, 1994. Taxpayers, however, may rely on this section for sales and exchanges that occur after December 21, 1992, and before April 4, 1994.
[T.D. 8517, 59 FR 4806, Feb. 2, 1994]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
14
cases, 1969–2017 · leading case:
Williams v. Comm'r, 94 T.C. 464 (Tax Ct. 1990).
Williams v. Comm'r, 94 T.C. 464 (Tax Ct. 1990).
· cites it 12× “, states: Generally, a contract under which there is total unstated interest (within the meaning of section 483(a)) shall be treated as if such interest were actually provided for in the contract, and such unstated interest shall constitute interest for all purposes of the Code.…”
Cocker v. Comm'r, 68 T.C. 544 (Tax Ct. 1977).
· cites it 10× “They believe no income was "generated" *96 by the exchange in question, and section 483 cannot be used to "create" interest income. Petitioners contest the validity of section 1.”
Weis v. Comm'r, 94 T.C. 473 (Tax Ct. 1990).
· cites it 2× “483-2(a), Income Tax Regs. The parties agree the contract for the farm's purchase comes within the purview of section 483 , 3 and a portion of the contract price shall be treated as interest.”
Robinson v. Comm'r, 54 T.C. 772 (Tax Ct. 1970).
· cites it 8× “557 (which was subsequently incorporated in section 1.483-2(a)(2) of the regulations) excluded sales or exchanges entered into after June 30, 1963, but prior to January 1, 1964, from the effect of applying section 483 to recompute the selling price for purpose of the 30-percent…”
Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Comm'r, 85 T.C. 172 (Tax Ct. 1985).
· cites it 2× “Consequently, we find that Geigy-Basle was the developer of the U.S. patents for the triazine herbicides.”
Paxton v. Comm'r, 53 T.C. 202 (Tax Ct. 1969).
· cites it 4× “*38 Petitioner further states that respondent's regulations support his contention in that section 1.”
Busse v. Comm'r, 58 T.C. 389 (Tax Ct. 1972).
· cites it 2× “Rather, section 1.483-2(b)(4), Income Tax Regs.”
Kingsley v. Comm'r, 72 T.C. 1095 (Tax Ct. 1979).
· cites it 4× “-- For purposes of this title, in the case of any contract for the sale or exchange of property there shall be treated as interest that part of a payment to which this section applies which bears the same ratio to the amount of such payment as the total unstated interest under…”
Williams v. Comm'r, 63 T.C.M. 2959 (Tax Ct. 1992).
· cites it 4× “Accrual method taxpayers must claim the unstated interest deduction in the taxable year in which the payment becomes due.”
Spyglass Partners v. Comm'r, 1995 T.C. Memo. 452 (Tax Ct. 1995).
· cites it 4× “If the taxpayer was on the accrual method of accounting for tax purposes, then the deduction was to be claimed in the year in which the payment became due.”
Aero Warehouse Corp. v. Comm'r, 57 T.C.M. 200 (Tax Ct. 1989).
· cites it 4× “Imputed interest is not a part of a purchaser's basis in property. Sec. 1.483-2(a)(1)(i), Income Tax Regs.”
Borna v. Comm'r, 2017 T.C. Memo. 73 (Tax Ct. 2017).
· cites it 4× “Petitioners argue that Mr. Borna received a dollar-for-dollar basis in the Barrow notes on account of his issuance of the Borna notes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.