This part implements the provisions of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001, Title IV of Public Law 107-42, 115 Stat. 230 (Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act), as amended by the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010, Title II of Public Law 111-347, and as amended by the James Zadroga 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund Reauthorization Act, Division O, Title IV of Public Law 114-113 (the “Act”) to provide full compensation to eligible individuals who were physically injured (as defined herein) as a result of the terrorist-related aircraft crashes of September 11, 2001, or the rescue and recovery efforts during the immediate aftermath of such crashes or debris removal during the immediate aftermath of those crashes, and to the “personal representatives” of those who were killed as a result of the crashes or the rescue and recovery efforts during the immediate aftermath of such crashes or debris removal during the immediate aftermath of such crashes. All compensation provided through the Victim Compensation Fund will be on account of personal physical conditions, physical injuries or death. The provisions of these regulations that relate to filing and evaluation of claims, determination of eligibility, and determination of compensable loss shall apply to all claims that are defined as Group B claims in the Act and in these regulations. Eligibility and compensation for Group A claims has been determined prior to the effective date of these regulations, pursuant to the regulations previously in effect.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case:
Hynes v. Jones, 204 A.3d 1128 (Conn. 2019).
Hynes v. Jones, 204 A.3d 1128 (Conn. 2019).
“See 28 C.F.R. § 104.1 et seq. (2002) ; 1 K. Feinberg et al.”
In re the Est. of Gomez, 5 Misc. 3d 534 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 2004).
“A two-option methodology for determining the amount of such awards was established under regulations promulgated by the Attorney General of the United States (28 CFR 104.1 et seq.) and refined in procedural and substantive rules issued by a special master appointed by him to…”
Marchand v. Marchand, 2007 NMCA 138 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007).
“” See 28 C.F.R. § 104.1 . The rules also state that the Special Master shall review submitted claims according to three factors: harm to the claimant, facts of the claim, and the individual circumstances of the claimant.”
Marchand v. Marchand, 171 P.3d 309 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007).
“" See 28 C.F.R. § 104.1 . The rules also state that the Special Master shall review submitted claims according to three factors: harm to the claimant, facts of the claim, and the individual circumstances of the claimant.”
White v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2025).
· cites it 2× “3623 (2011) (“2010 Act”); 28 C.F.R. § 104.1 (2011) (available at 76 Fed.”
Matter of Pryor-Holland, 2024 NY Slip Op 51009(U) (N.Y. Surr. Ct., Queens Cty. 2024).
“[FN1] For its part, the VCF, established in 2001 under 49 USC § 40101 , compensates individuals who suffered physical harm or were killed as a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the aftermath debris removal efforts ( 28 CFR § 104.1 ). Since it is also…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.