(a) A youthful inmate shall not be placed in a housing unit in which the youthful inmate will have sight, sound, or physical contact with any adult inmate through use of a shared dayroom or other common space, shower area, or sleeping quarters.
(b) In areas outside of housing units, agencies shall either:
(1) Maintain sight and sound separation between youthful inmates and adult inmates, or
(2) Provide direct staff supervision when youthful inmates and adult inmates have sight, sound, or physical contact.
(c) Agencies shall make best efforts to avoid placing youthful inmates in isolation to comply with this provision. Absent exigent circumstances, agencies shall not deny youthful inmates daily large-muscle exercise and any legally required special education services to comply with this provision. Youthful inmates shall also have access to other programs and work opportunities to the extent possible.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2024 · leading case:
Doe v. Dep't of Corr., 312 Mich. App. 97 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
Doe v. Dep't of Corr., 312 Mich. App. 97 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “All of this, despite the fact that the PREA, which was enacted in 2003, was expressly designed to prevent youthful inmates from being “placed in a housing unit in which the youthful inmate will have sight, sound, or physical contact with any adult inmate through use of a shared…”
Commonwealth v. Padilla (Mass. 2024).
“§ 11133 (a)(11),(12),(13); 28 C.F.R. § 115.14 . County sheriffs lack detention facilities that are capable of accommodating this requirement.”
John Doe 1 v. Dep't of Corr. (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
“All of this, despite the fact that the PREA, which was enacted in 2003, was expressly designed to prevent youthful inmates from being “placed in a housing unit in which the youthful inmate will have sight, sound, or physical contact with any adult inmate through use of a shared…”
— 28 C.F.R. § 115.14(a) — 1 case
Doe v. Dep't of Corr., 312 Mich. App. 97 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
“All of this, despite the fact that the PREA, which was enacted in 2003, was expressly designed to prevent youthful inmates from being “placed in a housing unit in which the youthful inmate will have sight, sound, or physical contact with any adult inmate through use of a shared…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.