28 C.F.R. § 16.30
Purpose and scope
This subpart contains the regulations of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) concerning procedures to be followed when the subject of an identification record requests production of that record to review it or to obtain a change, correction, or updating of that record.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1981–2015 · leading case: Michael Alexander v. United States, 787 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1986).
Michael Alexander v. United States, 787 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1986). “Although an alternate system of access has been provided in 28 C.F.R. 16.30 to 34 and 28 C.F.R. 20.34, the vast majority of records in this system concern local arrests which it would be inappropriate for the FBI to undertake to correct.”
James v. Adams v. Washington State Dept Of Corr., 361 P.3d 749 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “It directs our attention instead to 28 C.F.R. § 16.30 , which provides a different but nonexclusive procedure through which an inmate can obtain criminal history information.”
Susan Flander v. KForce, Inc., 526 F. App'x 364 (5th Cir. 2013). “28 C.F.R. § 16.30 . Moreover, Flander has not alleged a meaningful connection between Dyck (employed by Kforce) and JPMC’s review of Flander’s background or even that Dyck ever accessed the background check or knew the precise reason Flander failed it.”
Bryan v. Quinlan, 528 F. Supp. 930 (S.D.N.Y. 1981). “13 (1980) states: Inmate request for record clarification: Where the inmate believes that the record is incorrect or inaccurate, the inmate may follow procedures outlined in 28 C.F.R. 16.30 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.