28 C.F.R. § 19.5

Report to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

DOJ will compile and submit to OJJDP, by June 30, 1987, a consolidated report on its experience in implementation of 39 U.S.C. 3220(a)(2), the OJJDP guidelines and the DOJ regulation. The report will consolidate information gathered from individual DOJ organizational units and cover the period February 5, 1986 through March 31, 1987. The report will provide the following information:

(a) DOJ's experience in implementation, including problems encountered, successful and/or innovative methods adopted to use missing children photographs and information on or in penalty mail, the estimated number of pieces of penalty mail containing such information, and the estimated percentage of total agency penalty mail, domestic penalty mail, and domestic penalty mail directed to members of the public which this number represents.

(b) The estimated total cost to implement the program, with supporting detail (for example, printing cost, hours of labor or labor cost, cost related to withdrawal of photographs, etc.).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2003–2003 · leading case: Dee W. Kilpatrick, Claimant-Appellee v. Anthony J. Principi, Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 327 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dee W. Kilpatrick, Claimant-Appellee v. Anthony J. Principi, Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 327 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2003). “Because the Board is bound by prece-dential opinions of the DVA General Counsel, see 28 C.F.R. § 19.5 , and because Mr. Kilpatrick’s claims for chapter 21 and chapter 39 benefits were “based on disabilities resulting from VA medical care and not from military service,” the Board…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.