28 C.F.R. § 2.30
False information or new criminal conduct: Discovery after release
If evidence comes to the attention of the Commission after a prisoner's release that such prisoner has willfully provided false information or misrepresented information deemed significant to his application for parole or has engaged in any criminal conduct during the current sentence prior to the delivery of the parole certificate, the Regional Commissioner may reopen the case pursuant to the procedures of § 2.28(f) and order the prisoner summoned or retaken for hearing pursuant to the procedures of §§ 2.49 and 2.50, as applicable, to determine whether the order of parole should be cancelled.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1975–1982 · leading case: Phillip Bruce Christopher v. U. S. Bd. of Parole, 589 F.2d 924 (7th Cir. 1978).
Phillip Bruce Christopher v. U. S. Bd. of Parole, 589 F.2d 924 (7th Cir. 1978). “28 C.F.R. Section 2.30(a) (now 2.229(a)) provides that a "grant to parole shall not be deemed to be effective until a certificate of parole has been delivered to the prisoner.”
Drayton v. McCall, 445 F. Supp. 305 (D. Conn. 1978). “This provision allowing the Commission to rescind parole upon receipt of new information is augmented by 28 C.F.R. § 2.30 (1977), a regulation allowing the Regional Commissioner to initiate the § 2.”
Jackson v. Wise, 390 F. Supp. 19 (C.D. Cal. 1975). “20 (1973), which read in pertinent part: “When an effective date has been set by the Board, release on that date shall be conditioned upon continued good conduct by the prisoner Shortly after the rescission in this case, the relevant federal regulations were revised; the quoted…”
Tortora v. Petrovsky, 545 F. Supp. 569 (W.D. Mo. 1982). “The Commission based its authority to void petitioner’s parole grant on 28 C.F.R. § 2.30 , which provides: *571 False or withheld information.”
— 28 C.F.R. § 2.30(a) — 1 case
Phillip Bruce Christopher v. U. S. Bd. of Parole, 589 F.2d 924 (7th Cir. 1978). “28 C.F.R. Section 2.30(a) (now 2.229(a)) provides that a "grant to parole shall not be deemed to be effective until a certificate of parole has been delivered to the prisoner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.