28 C.F.R. § 2.4
Same: Youth offenders and juvenile delinquents
Committed youth offenders and juvenile delinquents may be released on parole at any time in the discretion of the Commission.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1976–1985 · leading case: United States v. Anthony Salerno Appeal of William Silverman, 538 F.2d 1005 (3rd Cir. 1976).
United States v. Anthony Salerno Appeal of William Silverman, 538 F.2d 1005 (3rd Cir. 1976). “See 28 C.F.R. § 2.4 (1973); Project, supra, 84 Yale L.”
United States v. Lawrence Francis McBride, 560 F.2d 7 (1st Cir. 1977). “See 28 C.F.R. § 2.4 (1973). As matters stood in 1974, the district court might suppose (although it could not require) that at approximately the time McBride was considered by state authorities *10 to be ready for parole he would also be paroled by federal authorities: the two…”
Vanacore v. United States, 440 F. Supp. 442 (E.D.N.Y 1977). “1976); see gen 28 C.F.R. § 2.4 (1973). While this system was highly individualized, it failed to compensate for the often disparate sentences imposed by various judges.”
United States v. Brice Earl Christians, 702 F.2d 740 (8th Cir. 1983). “After this hearing, the United States Parole Commission issued a “Notice of Action,” which stated that if Christians satisfactorily completed his program plan, his presumptive parole would occur after service of sixty months or on January 24, 1987.”
United States v. Chandra McDonald Danny Ray Taylor, 775 F.2d 724 (6th Cir. 1985). “§§ 5017 (a), 5041; 28 C.F.R. § 2.4 , or the offender could receive an unconditional release with an expunction of the offender’s record.”
United States v. Womble, 444 F. Supp. 617 (D.S.C. 1978). “Prior to 1973, the Parole Commission had been basing parole decisions on the inmate’s institutional conduct, probability of recidivism, and the interests of society, 28 C.F.R. § 2.4 (1973), which standards allowed for discretionary application to particular cases, and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.