Pursuant to the authority granted at 18 U.S.C. 4126, the procedures set forth in this part govern the payment of accident compensation, necessitated as the result of work-related injuries, to federal prison inmates or their dependents. Compensation may be awarded via two separate and distinct programs:
(a) Inmate Accident Compensation may be awarded to former federal inmates or their dependents for physical impairment or death resultant from injuries sustained while performing work assignments in Federal Prison Industries, Inc., in institutional work assignments involving the operation or maintenance of a federal correctional facility, or in approved work assignments for other federal entities; or,
(b) Lost-time wages may be awarded to inmates assigned to Federal Prison Industries, Inc., to paid institutional work assignments involving the operation or maintenance of a federal correctional facility, or in approved work assignments for other federal entities for work-related injuries resulting in time lost from the work assignment.
[55 FR 9296, Mar. 12, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 2666, Jan. 18, 1994]
Notes of Decisions
Stephen Koprowski v. Karen Baker (2016)
ca6 · cites it 6×
“See 28 C.F.R. § 301.101 . In July 2011, Koprowski brought this Bivens suit against six prison officials, who are defendants-appellees here.”
Smith v. United States (2009)
ca10
“28 C.F.R. §§ 301.101 (a), 301.301-.319. If the inmate still suffers a residual physical impairment as a result of the work-related injury, then within forty-five days of his release date, he can submit a claim for compensation.”
Walker v. Reese (2010)
ca5
“FTCA claim Walker argues that the district court erred in finding his exclusive remedy against the Government was provided by the BOP’s Inmate Accident Compensation (“IAC”) procedures set forth in 28 C.”
Oliver Thomas v. Joey Paul and M. Vigneault (2019)
nhd
“; see also 28 C.F.R. § 301.101 . Consistent with BOP’s regulatory definition of a work-related injury, courts have concluded that IACA funds are not available to compensate inmates who allege claims of constitutional violations like Thomas’s, see Alexander, 2018 U.”
Vega v. Johns (2019)
gasd · cites it 2×
“§ 4126 ; 28 C.F.R. § 301.101 et seq. (containing the regulations supporting the IACA, which are often referred to as the Inmate Accident Compensation Program (“IACP”)); United States v.”
Jaime Perez v. United States (2020)
ca5
“And because the regulations only provide for compensation for “work-related injuries,” 28 C.F.R. § 301.101 (b), not for injuries sustained during a fight, see id.”
Gardner v. United States (2017)
mdd
“” 28 C.F.R. § 301.101 (2017). Further, the regulations define “work-related injury” as including “any injury, including ocpupational disease or illness, proximately caused by the actual performance of the inmate’s work assignment.”
Charles Simon v. DOJ (2022)
ca7
“§ 4126 ; 28 C.F.R. § 301.101 , et seq., along with the termination of his payments in 2018.”
Rhodes v. United States (2019)
ilsd
“§ 4126 , 28 C.F.R. 301.101, et seq. MOTION TO DISMISS STANDARD When reviewing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, the Court accepts as true all allegations in the complaint.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.