C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER III—FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › PART 301—INMATE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION › Subpart C—Compensation for Work-Related Physical Impairment or Death

28 C.F.R. § 301.319

Exclusiveness of remedy

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Inmates who are subject to the provisions of these Inmate Accident Compensation regulations are barred from recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. 2671 et seq.). Recovery under the Inmate Accident Compensation procedure was declared by the U.S. Supreme Court to be the exclusive remedy in the case of work-related injury. U.S. v. Demko, 385 U.S. 149 (1966).

[55 FR 9296, Mar. 12, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 2667, Jan. 18, 1994]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2008–2024 · leading case: Stephen Koprowski v. Karen Baker
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stephen Koprowski v. Karen Baker (2016) ca6 · cites it 6× “The regulation cited by the dissent, 28 C.F.R. § 301.319 , speaks specifically to the exclusivity of the IACA with respect to claims that could otherwise be brought under the FTCA.”
Dominguez v. United States (2013) ctd “§ 4126 provided exclusive scheme for compensation); 28 C.F.R. § 301.319 (“Inmates who are subject to the provisions of these Inmate Accident Compensation regulations are barred from recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act”); Saladino v.”
Thompson v. Joslin (2008) txsd “2d 258 (1966)); accord 28 C.F.R. § 301.319 . A federal inmate seeking compensation for a prison work-place IAC claim, must exhaust his administrative remedies.”
Marquez-Ortiz v. United States (2023) nysd · cites it 2× “; 28 C.F.R. § 301.319 (citing U.S. v. Demko, 385 U.”
Simon v. United States Department of Justice (2021) dcd “149 , 152–54 (1966); see also 28 C.F.R. § 301.319 (“Inmates who are subject to the provisions of these Inmate Accident Compensation regulations are barred from recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act ( 28 U.”
Burnside v. Department of Justice (2022) dcd “149 , 152–54 (1966); 28 C.F.R. § 301.319 (“Inmates who are subject to the provisions of the [IACA] are barred from recovery under the [FTCA].”
Gardner v. United States (2017) mdd “302 . Whether or not a claim is made under IACA, “[ijnmates who are subject to the provisions of these [IACA] regulations are barred from recovery under the Federal Tort Claims- Act,” and IACA provides the exclusive remedy in the event of work-related injury to inmates.”
Rhodes v. United States (2019) ilsd “149, 152-54 (1966); 28 C.F.R. §301.319 . The parties dispute whether Plaintiff’s injuries fall within the purview of the IACA.”
Rivera-Ruperto v. USP McCreary (2022) kyed “”) (citations omitted); 28 C.F.R. § 301.319 (“Inmates who are subject to the provisions of these Inmate Accident Compensation regulations are barred from recovery under the [FTCA]”).”
Sloan v. BOP of Allenwood (2023) pamd “28 C.F.R. § 301.319 (“Inmates who are subject to the provisions of these Inmate Accident Compensation regulations are barred from recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act[.”
Wright v. Bragg (2020) scd “28 C.F.R. § 301.319 (“Inmates who are subject to the provisions of these Inmate Accident Compensation regulations are barred from recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act.”
Valoy v. United States (2024) pamd “” 28 C.F.R. § 301.319 . Here, Valoy alleges that his injuries occurred while he was “on duty as an inmate worker in the Kitchen Department section of U.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.