C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › PART 35—NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES › Subpart A—General

28 C.F.R. § 35.107

Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Designation of responsible employee. A public entity that employs 50 or more persons shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with and carry out its responsibilities under this part, including any investigation of any complaint communicated to it alleging its noncompliance with this part or alleging any actions that would be prohibited by this part. The public entity shall make available to all interested individuals the name, office address, and telephone number of the employee or employees designated pursuant to this paragraph.

(b) Complaint procedure. A public entity that employs 50 or more persons shall adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by this part.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: Brown v. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brown v. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs. (2019) mdd · cites it 2× “28 C.F.R. § 35.107 . The designated employee is commonly referred to as the "ADA Coordinator.”
In the Interest of Doe (2002) haw · cites it 3× “The ADA provides for a private right of action for Title II violations, 42 U.”
Kirola v. City of San Francisco (2014) cand · cites it 5× “107(b), provides that: “A public entity that employs 50 or more persons shall adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by this part.”
Dunn v. Dunn (2016) almd · cites it 2× “They highlighted three in particular (which also constitute violations of Department of Justice regulations promulgated pursuant to Title II of the ADA see 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.107 (a), 35.107(b), 35.150(d)): the failure to (1) appoint and train ADA coordinators, (2) adopt ADA…”
Doe v. Division of Youth and Family Services (2001) njd “Among other things, those regulations require the States to perform self-evaluations of their existing policies and practices, see 28 C.”
Disabled in Action v. Bd. of Elections in the City of New York, et (2014) ca2 “See 28 C.F.R. § 35.107 (a). Nor does BOE have an accessibility transition plan for the poll sites that it designates.”
Clark v. California (2010) cand · cites it 2× “” 28 C.F.R. § 35.107 (b). 39. Because access must be “meaningful,” Alexander, 469 U.”
Armstrong v. Davis (2001) ca9 “See 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.107 (ADA coordinator and grievance procedures) 35.”
Clarkson v. Coughlin (1995) nysd “See 28 C.F.R. § 35.107 . As will be discussed in detail, Defendants have violated the ADA by their failure to notify class members of the protections to which they are entitled under the ADA, consult with class members as to effective accommodations, perform a self-evaluation…”
In re B.S. (1997) vt “§ 12133 , and its regulations require public entities to adopt and publicize grievance procedures, 28 C.F.R. § 35.107 , and outline a federal complaint procedure, id.”
Tugg v. Towey (1994) flsd · cites it 2× “However, despite this training, Quintana testified that HRS District XI has no ADA grievance procedures, as mandated by *1211 28 C.F.R. § 35.107 . That regulation states, in pertinent part: (b) Complaint procedure.”
John Croley v. Joint Committee on Judicial Administration (2018) cadc “4, nor the requirement to designate an ADA coordinator and to create grievance procedures per 28 C.F.R. § 35.107 , see Compl. ¶ 34(c). For the Joint Committee's failure to establish an appropriate disability accommodation "policy," id.”
Show all 36 citing cases →
— 28 C.F.R. § 35.107(A) — 2 cases
Foster v. Henderson (2023) ohsd
Foster v. Ohio D.R.C. (2023) ohsd
— 28 C.F.R. § 35.107(b) — 2 cases
Robert Patnaude v. South Dakota Department of Corrections, Kellie Wasko, Secretary of Corrections, Alejandro Reyes, Ward (2026) sdd
Law v. N.M. Human Servs. Dep’t (2019) nmctapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.