28 C.F.R. § 36.205
Association
A public accommodation shall not exclude or otherwise deny equal goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, accommodations, or other opportunities to an individual or entity because of the known disability of an individual with whom the individual or entity is known to have a relationship or association.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1999–2013 · leading case: Freilich v. Bd. of Directors of Upper Chesapeake Health, Inc., 142 F. Supp. 2d 679 (D. Maryland 2001).
Freilich v. Bd. of Directors of Upper Chesapeake Health, Inc., 142 F. Supp. 2d 679 (D. Maryland 2001). “” See 28 C.F.R. § 36.205 , App. B, at 634. Just as the AIDS advocates’ conduct in Oliveras-Sifre did not fit within the framework of the associational provision of Title I, Dr.”
George v. AZ Eagle TT Corp., 961 F. Supp. 2d 971 (D. Ariz. 2013). “” 28 C.F.R. § 36.205 . “For example, it would be a violation of [ 28 C.”
United States v. Nobel Learning Communities, Inc., 676 F. Supp. 2d 379 (E.D. Pa. 2009). “28 C.F.R. § 36.205 . In the commentary accompanying its Title III associational discrimination regulations, the Department of Justice explains: The individuals covered under this section include any individuals who are discriminated against because of their known association…”
Bravin v. Ctr., 186 F.R.D. 293 (S.D.N.Y. 1999). “Bravin claims that she was discriminated against due to her “relationship or association” with Bravin, a person with a disability and a “qualified individual” pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 36.205 . The new claims interposed by Mrs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.