28 C.F.R. § 41.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this part is to implement Executive Order 12250, which requires the Department of Justice to coordinate the implementation of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

[43 FR 2132, Jan. 13, 1978. Redesignated and amended at 46 FR 40686, 40687, Aug. 11, 1981]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1955–2019 · leading case: Frame v. City of Arlington, 657 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Frame v. City of Arlington, 657 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “28 C.F.R. § 41.1 . [53] 28 C.F.R. § 41.58 (a) (requiring new facilities to be accessible, and altered facilities to be accessible "to the maximum extent feasible"); id.”

Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Dep't of Just., 170 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 1999). “They argue that, because 28 C.F.R. § 41.1 et seq. (1989) prohibited employment discrimination, the foregoing provision demonstrates Congress’ intent to incorporate that prohibition into Title II.”

Nat'l Lawyers Guild v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney Gen. of the United States, 225 F.2d 552 (D.C. Cir. 1955). · cites it 2× “1947), provides: “The Loyalty Review Board shall currently be furnished by the Department of Justice the name of each foreign or domestic organization, association, movement, group or combination of persons which the Attorney General, after appropriate investigation and…”

Indus. Workers of the World, Etc. v. Ramsey Clark, Attorney Gen. of the United States, 385 F.2d 687 (D.C. Cir. 1967). · cites it 2× “See 28 C.F.R. § 41.1 (a) (1967). Failure to file such a notice of contest was declared to be “an acquiescence in such designation.”

Conlon v. City of Long Beach, 676 F. Supp. 1289 (E.D.N.Y 1987). “28 C.F.R. § 41.1 , 41.4(a) (1986). To the extent that the City of Long Beach may be deemed a recipient of federal financial assistance, see I.”

Gordon v. Blount, 336 F. Supp. 1271 (D.D.C. 1971). “The government has cited no administrative remedy now available to the SWP to challenge the use of the list or its constitutionality.”

Helen L. v. DiDario, 46 F.3d 325 (3rd Cir. 1995). “” 28 C.F.R. § 41.1 . A subsequent section requires all federal agencies to issue regulations “to implement section 504 with respect to programs and activities to which it provides assistance.”

Nat'l Ass'n of the Deaf v. Harvard Univ. (D. Mass. 2019). “See 28 C.F.R. §§ 41.1 – 41.58. 5 DOE has issued regulations implementing Section 504 as to the programs and activities to which it provides assistance.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.