C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › PART 42—NONDISCRIMINATION; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY; POLICIES AND PROCEDURES › Subpart G—Nondiscrimination Based on Handicap in Federally Assisted Programs or Activities—Implementation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

28 C.F.R. § 42.502

Application

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart applies to each recipient of Federal financial assistance from the Department of Justice and to each program or activity receiving such assistance. The requirements of this subpart do not apply to the ultimate beneficiaries of Federal financial assistance in the program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2021 · leading case: Torcasio v. Murray, 57 F.3d 1340 (4th Cir. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Torcasio v. Murray, 57 F.3d 1340 (4th Cir. 1995). “” 28 C.F.R. § 42.502 . The regulations therefore define the reach of the Rehabilitation Act using the same broad language as does the Act itself; as we stated above, this broad language is insufficient to clearly establish that the Act applies to state prisons.”
Onishea v. Hopper, 171 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir. 1999). “, 28 C.F.R. § 42.502 ; 29 C.F.R. § 32.2 (a).”
Delmonte v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., 877 F. Supp. 1563 (S.D. Fla. 1995). “” 28 C.F.R. § 42.502 . The definition of “Federal financial assistance” found in this subpart is identical to the definition in 28 C.”
Ndiaye v. United States of Am. (N.D. Ohio 2021). “540 “applies to each recipient of Federal financial assistance from the Department of Justice and to each program or activity receiving such assistance,” 28 C.F.R. § 42.502 , and Section 41.3 “applies to each Federal department and agency that is empowered to extend Federal…”
Onishea v. Hopper, 126 F.3d 1323 (11th Cir. 1997). “, 28 C.F.R. § 42.502 ; 29 C.F.R. § 32.2 (a).”
Onishea v. Hopper, 126 F.3d 1323 (11th Cir. 1997). “, 28 C.F.R. § 42.502 ; 29 C.F.R. § 32.2 (a).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.