28 C.F.R. § 48.8

Written comments and requests for a hearing

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any person who believes that the Attorney General should or should not approve a proposed arrangement, may at any time after filing of the application until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register of the notice required in § 48.6,

(1) File written comments stating the reasons why approval should or should not be granted, and/or

(2) File a request that a hearing be held on the application. A request for a hearing shall set forth the issues of fact to be determined and the reasons that a hearing is required to determine them.

(b) Any person may within 30 days after the filing of any comment or request pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, file a reply for the consideration of the Attorney General.

(c) After the expiration of the time for filing of replies in accordance with § 48.7 and this section the Attorney General shall either approve or deny approval of the arrangement, in accordance with § 48.14, or shall order that a hearing be held.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1983–1989 · leading case: Michigan Citizens for an Independent Press v. Richard Thornburgh, United States Attorney General

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Michigan Citizens for an Independent Press v. Richard Thornburgh, United States Attorney General (1989) cadc “See 28 C.F.R. § 48.8 (1988). Both men relied on the very same facts to make different evaluations of the competitive strength of the Free Press.”

Committee for an Independent P-I v. Hearst Corp. (1983) ca9 “§§ 554 , 556, 706(2)(E); 28 C.F.R. § 48.8 (c). The Committee asserts that, nevertheless, a hearing was held and the regulations require that all hearings be conducted pursuant to 5 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.