Inmates and members of the public may request access to Administrative Remedy indexes and responses, for which inmate names and Register Numbers have been removed, as indicated below. Each institution shall make available its index, and the indexes of its regional office and the Central Office. Each regional office shall make available its index, the indexes of all institutions in its region, and the index of the Central Office. The Central Office shall make available its index and the indexes of all institutions and regional offices. Responses may be requested from the location where they are maintained and must be identified by Remedy ID number as indicated on an index. Copies of indexes or responses may be inspected during regular office hours at the locations indicated above, or may be purchased in accordance with the regular fees established for copies furnished under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2025 · leading case:
Darrell Debrew v. Atwood, 792 F.3d 118 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
Darrell Debrew v. Atwood, 792 F.3d 118 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
“” 28 C.F.R. § 542.19 . Yet each of the officials he contacted failed to send DeBrew a copy of the Regional Director’s response from the Administrative Remedy.”
Tereshchuk v. Bureau of Prisons, 67 F. Supp. 3d 441 (D.D.C. 2014).
· cites it 2× “28 C.F.R. 542.19. Alternatively, the responses may be purchased in accordance with the regular fees established for copies furnished under FOIA.”
Aaron DeRoo v. Carol Holinka, 373 F. App'x 617 (7th Cir. 2010).
“See 28 C.F.R. § 542.19 (explaining process for taking administrative appeal from adverse disciplinary decision where no statement of reasons has been provided to inmate).”
Terrence Brown v. Eric Wilson (5th Cir. 2020).
“Brown argued that officials at the Federal Medical Center in Fort Worth, Texas, denied him access to inspect the Administrative Remedy indexes and responses in violation of 28 C.F.R. § 542.19 . He asserted that this amounted to a denial of his First Amendment right to petition for…”
Rodriguez Rosa v. Spaulding (D. Mass. 2020).
“There is no evidence that petitioner could not request access to his “Administrative Remedy indexes and responses,” 28 C.F.R. § 542.19 , and he does not provide evidence to support his assertion that staff told him “FCI Oakdale had contacted DSCC” and that the July 2015 request…”
Boswell v. United States (E.D. Ky. 2025).
“See 28 C.F.R. § 542.19 (“Inmates and members of the public may request access to Administrative Remedy indexes and responses, for which inmate names and Register Numbers have been removed, as indicated below.”
Darrell Debrew v. Atwood (D.C. Cir. 2015).
“” 28 C.F.R. § 542.19 . Yet each of the officials he contacted failed to send DeBrew a copy of the Regional Director’s response from the Administrative Remedy Index.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.