28 C.F.R. § 545.10
Purpose and scope
The Bureau of Prisons encourages each sentenced inmate to meet his or her legitimate financial obligations. As part of the initial classification process, staff will assist the inmate in developing a financial plan for meeting those obligations, and at subsequent program reviews, staff shall consider the inmate's efforts to fulfill those obligations as indicative of that individual's acceptance and demonstrated level of responsibility. The provisions of this rule apply to all inmates in federal facilities, except: Study and observation cases, pretrial detainees, and inmates in holdover status pending designation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 105
cases (21 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Barrett N. Weinberger v. United States, 268 F.3d 346 (6th Cir. 2001).
Barrett N. Weinberger v. United States, 268 F.3d 346 (6th Cir. 2001). “1998) (quoting 28 C.F.R. 545.10). The program allows for the development of a financial plan that allows inmates to pay enumerated obligations, such as restitution payments, while incarcerated.”
McGee v. Martinez, 627 F.3d 933 (3rd Cir. 2010). “While at McKean, McGee was introduced to the Inmate Financial Responsibility Plan (“IFRP”), 28 C.F.R. §§ 545.10 , 545.11. He agreed to pay a minimum of $25 per quarter toward his fine in exchange for not (1) being limited to spending $25 per month in the commissary, (2) being…”
United States v. Gerald A. Coates Gerald Coates, 178 F.3d 681 (3rd Cir. 1999). “See 28 C.F.R. § 545.10 (permitting Bureau of Prisons to determine payment schedules).”
United States v. Lemoine, 546 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2008). “28 C.F.R. § 545.10 . It is intended to “encourage[] each sentenced inmate to meet his *1047 or her legitimate financial obligations.”
United States v. Stephen Robert Gunning, 401 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 2005). “11 ; see also 28 C.F.R. § 545.10 . Not surprisingly, restitution is one of the obligations with which the BOP concerns itself, and it is, indeed, a top priority.”
Prows v. United States Dep't of Just., 704 F. Supp. 272 (D.D.C. 1988). “Plaintiff, a prisoner in the La Tuna Federal Correctional Institution in Anthony, New Mexico, challenges the constitutional and statutory validity of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (“IFRP”), 28 C.F.R. § 545.10 et seq. Under the plan, the…”
United States v. Boyd, 608 F.3d 331 (7th Cir. 2010). “See 28 C.F.R. § 545.10 . Inmates who do not participate may lose a number of privileges identified in 28 C.”
United States v. Elvis E. Webb, 30 F.3d 687 (6th Cir. 1994). “See 28 C.F.R. § 545.10 ; United States v. Williams, 996 F.”
James v. Quinlan, 866 F.2d 627 (3rd Cir. 1989). “In 1987, the federal prison system adopted the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, now codified at 28 C.F.R. §§ 545.10 and 545.11 (1988). This program provides for inmates to work with prison staff to develop a financial responsibility plan, with the goal of paying their…”
Paul Driggers v. Maureen Cruz, 740 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 2014). “” 28 C.F.R. § 545.10 . An inmate makes payments under the IFRP according to a plan developed by BOP staff; the staff then monitors that inmate’s progress in meeting his obligations under the plan.”
Manuel MONTANO-FIGUEROA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph H. CRABTREE, Warden, FCI, Sheridan, Respondent-Appellee, 162 F.3d 548 (9th Cir. 1998). “” See 28 C.F.R. § 545.10 . The program provides for development of a financial plan that allows inmates to pay certain enumerated obligations, including court-ordered assessments, restitution, and fines.”
United States v. Hoang Van Tran, & Vicheth Som, 234 F.3d 798 (2d Cir. 2000). “Som is incorrect in asserting that 28 C.F.R. §§ 545.10 & 545.11 and 18 U.S.C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.