C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER V—BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › SUBCHAPTER C—INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT › PART 550—DRUG PROGRAMS › Subpart D—Urine Surveillance

28 C.F.R. § 550.30

Purpose and scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Warden shall establish programs of urine testing for drug use, to monitor specific groups or individual inmates who are considered as high risk for drug use, such as those involved in community activities, those with a history of drug use, and those inmates specifically suspected of drug use. Testing shall be performed with frequency determined by the Warden on at least 50 percent of those inmates who are involved in community activities. In addition, staff shall randomly sample each institution's inmate population during each month to test for drug use.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1982–2000 · leading case: Storms v. Coughlin, 600 F. Supp. 1214 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Storms v. Coughlin, 600 F. Supp. 1214 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). · cites it 2× “” 28 C.F.R. § 550.30 (a), (b). 4 The regulations do not specify what initial tests or validating procedures are to be utilized.”
Kingsley v. Bureau of Prisons, 937 F.2d 26 (2d Cir. 1991). · cites it 3× “Kingsley alleges that his constitutional rights were violated during a random prison drug test and in subsequent disciplinary proceedings that occurred because he allegedly refused to provide a urine sample within two hours, in violation of 28 C.F.R. § 550.30 (c) (1990). 1 We…”
Bourgeois v. Murphy, 809 P.2d 472 (Idaho 1991). · cites it 2× “' 28 C.F.R. § 550.30 (a), (b). The regulations do not specify what initial tests or validating procedures are to be utilized.”
Wykoff v. Resig, 613 F. Supp. 1504 (N.D. Ind. 1985). “The manufacturers of the EMIT system, Syva Corporation, recommends that all positive EMIT results be confirmed where a greater degree of certainty is required.”
Peranzo v. Coughlin, 608 F. Supp. 1504 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). “237-38; see also 28 C.F.R. § 550.30 (1984) (Federal Bureau of Prisons requirement that positive urine test be “validated to substantiate the positive result”).”
Ramey v. Hawk, 730 F. Supp. 1366 (E.D.N.C. 1989). · cites it 2× “28 C.F.R. § 550.30 amended at 53 Fed.Reg.”
Adkins v. Martin, 699 F. Supp. 1510 (W.D. Okla. 1988). “28 C.F.R. Sections 550.30 et seq., 541.10 et seq.”
Hampson v. Satran, 319 N.W.2d 796 (N.D. 1982). “The federal urine screening program is outlined in 28 C.F.R. § 550.30 (1981): “Subpart D — Urine Surveillance to Detect and Deter Illegal Drug Use “§ 550.”
McElhiney v. Booker (10th Cir. 2000). “28 C.F.R. § 550.30 confirms this: The Warden shall establish programs of urine testing for drug use, to monitor specific groups or individual inmates who are considered as high risk for drug use, such as those involved in community activities, those with a history of drug use,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.