28 C.F.R. § 570.22
Designation
Inmates will be considered for pre-release community confinement in a manner consistent with 18 U.S.C. section 3621(b), determined on an individual basis, and of sufficient duration to provide the greatest likelihood of successful reintegration into the community, within the time-frames set forth in this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2009–2025 · leading case: George Vasquez v. Strada, 684 F.3d 431 (3rd Cir. 2012).
George Vasquez v. Strada, 684 F.3d 431 (3rd Cir. 2012). “See 28 C.F.R. § 570.22 . In addition to the individual determination under section 3621(b), a prisoner’s participation in, or completion of, Inmate Skills Development programs within the institution is considered separately to determine if additional placement time is warranted…”
Ricardo Gallegos-Hernandez v. USA, 688 F.3d 190 (5th Cir. 2012). “See 28 C.F.R. § 570.22 . Consequently, there is no right conferred here.”
Derrick Wilson v. Strada, 474 F. App'x 46 (3rd Cir. 2012). “See 28 C.F.R. § 570.22 . In addition to the individual determination under section 3621(b), a prisoner’s participation in, or completion of, Inmate Skills Development programs within the institution is considered separately to determine if additional placement time is warranted…”
Strong v. Schultz, 599 F. Supp. 2d 556 (D.N.J. 2009). “28 C.F.R. § 570.22 (Oct. 21, 2008). This Court finds that, by instructing staff that pre-release placement needs can usually be accommodated by a placement of six months or less and by denying staff the discretion to recommend a placement longer than six months (without advance…”
Bernard v. ROAL, 716 F. Supp. 2d 354 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). “21 (a) ("[i]nmates may be designated to community confinement as a condition of prerelease custody and programming during the final months of the inmate's term of imprisonment, not to exceed twelve months”); 28 C.F.R. § 570.22 ("[ijnmates will be considered for pre-release…”
Jerome Porter-Bey v. B. Bledsoe, 456 F. App'x 109 (3rd Cir. 2012). “See 28 C.F.R. § 570.22 (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3621 (b)).”
Michael Garcia v. United States, 518 F. App'x 78 (3rd Cir. 2013). “28 C.F.R. § 570.22 . To that end, a Unit Team must review an inmate's request for pre-release community confinement and make an appropriate RRC determination prior to placement.”
Felix v. Warden, FCI Danbury (D. Conn. 2025). “”); 28 C.F.R. § 570.22 (“Inmates will be considered for pre-release community confinement in a manner consistent with 18 U.”
United States v. Brandon Caudle (4th Cir. 2018). “” 28 C.F.R. § 570.22 (2018); see Sacora, 628 F.”
Freno v. Kallis (C.D. Ill. 2019). “21 (a); 28 C.F.R. § 570.22 . The statute also requires that determinations be made on an individual basis and “conducted in a manner consistent with section 3621(b).”
Jones v. English (D. Kan. 2019). “See 28 C.F.R. § 570.22 (2008) (“Inmates will be considered for pre-release community confinement in a manner consistent with 18 U.”
Salters v. Hudson (D. Kan. 2020). “See 28 C.F.R. § 570.22 (2008) (“Inmates will be considered for pre-release community confinement in a manner consistent with 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.