C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › PART 68—RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES IN CASES INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT OF ALIENS, UNFAIR IMMIGRATION-RELATED EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES, AND DOCUMENT FRAUD

28 C.F.R. § 68.51

Restricted access

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

On his/her own motion, or on the motion of any party, the Administrative Law Judge may direct that there be a restricted access portion of the record to contain any material in the record to which public access is restricted by law or by the terms of a protective order entered in the proceedings. This portion of the record shall be placed in a separate file and clearly marked to avoid improper disclosure and to identify it as a portion of the official record in the proceedings.

[54 FR 48596, Nov. 24, 1989. Redesignated by Order No. 1534-91, 56 FR 50053, Oct. 3, 1991]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–1991 · leading case: Gus Kirk, Candy Kirk, as Individuals, & D/B/A Kirk Enter. v. U.S. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. United States of Am., 927 F.2d 1106 (9th Cir. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gus Kirk, Candy Kirk, as Individuals, & D/B/A Kirk Enter. v. U.S. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. United States of Am., 927 F.2d 1106 (9th Cir. 1991). · cites it 2× “The Kirks requested a review of the AU’s order, pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 68.51 (a). The CAHO affirmed the order of the AU.”
Mesa Airlines v. United States, 951 F.2d 1186 (10th Cir. 1991). “Sixty-three days after the date of the order, on September 25, 1989, the Clerk of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals received and filed Mesa’s Petition for Review. The Special Counsel moved to dismiss the petition as untimely filed.”
A-Plus Roofing, Inc. v. U.S. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. United States of Am., 929 F.2d 489 (9th Cir. 1991). “Both the statute and the regulation interpreting it ( 28 C.F.R. § 68.51 ) indicate that the ALJ’s order “becomes final” after 30 days have passed if no further objection is made at the agency level, and that review *490 may be sought within 45 days after the final order is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.