29 C.F.R. § 101.13

Compliance with Board decision and order

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Shortly after the Board's decision and order is issued the Director of the Regional Office in which the charge was filed communicates with the respondent for the purpose of obtaining compliance. Conferences may be held to arrange the details necessary for compliance with the terms of the order.

(b) If the respondent effects full compliance with the terms of the order, the Regional Director submits a report to that effect to Washington, DC, after which the case may be closed. Despite compliance, however, the Board's order is a continuing one; therefore, the closing of a case on compliance is necessarily conditioned upon the continued observance of that order; and in some cases it is deemed desirable, notwithstanding compliance, to implement the order with an enforcing court judgment. Subsequent violations of the order may become the basis of further proceedings.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1972–1990 · leading case: Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. PIE Nationwide, Inc., 894 F.2d 887 (7th Cir. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. PIE Nationwide, Inc., 894 F.2d 887 (7th Cir. 1990). “) As a result, in relatively few cases does the Board seek enforcement of its order other than by cross-motion when the respondent has petitioned for review; this is such a case, however.”

Gould, Inc. v. Wisconsin Dep't of Indus., Labor & Human Relations, 750 F.2d 608 (7th Cir. 1984). · cites it 2× “29 C.F.R. § 101.13 (b). 13 Consequently the NLRB itself may in some instances initiate an enforcement proceeding — even if a private company would seek to avoid such a proceeding by complying with the order at issue.”

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 85, Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of Am., 454 F.2d 875 (9th Cir. 1972). “” *878 The Act contains no language which even suggests such a precondition and, if Local 85 means by its reference to the Board’s “Procedure” the latter’s own regulations, the only one at all relevant appears to be 29 C.F.R. 101.13(a); the pertinent language is that “after the…”

— 29 C.F.R. § 101.13(a) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.