C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER I—NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD › PART 101—STATEMENTS OF PROCEDURES › Subpart B—Unfair Labor Practice Cases Under Section 10 (a) to (i) of the Act and Telegraph Merger Act Cases

29 C.F.R. § 101.15

Compliance with court judgment

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

After a Board order has been enforced by a court judgment, the Board has the responsibility of obtaining compliance with that judgment. Investigation is made by the Regional Office of the respondent's efforts to comply. If it finds that the respondent has failed to live up to the terms of the court's judgment, the General Counsel may, on behalf of the Board, petition the court to hold the respondent in contempt of court. The court may order immediate remedial action and impose sanctions and penalties.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1974–2023 · leading case: Overnite Transp. Co. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of Am., AFL-CIO, 773 N.E.2d 26 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Overnite Transp. Co. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of Am., AFL-CIO, 773 N.E.2d 26 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 2× “In the event that the NLRB's order is not complied with, or the NLRB determines that it is advisable to implement the order with a court judgment or a party wishes to challenge the NLRB's decision, petition for such relief may be made to the appropriate federal court.”
NLRB v. Neises Constr. Corporatio, 62 F.4th 1040 (7th Cir. 2023). “We need not reach the merits of this argument because the five- member Board, on whose behalf the petition is filed in the first place, see 29 C.F.R. § 101.15 , formally endorsed seeking con- tempt here.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nickey Chevrolet Sales, Inc., 493 F.2d 103 (7th Cir. 1974). · cites it 2× “, 1962); 29 C.F.R. 101.15, 29 U.S.C.A., p. 275. The purpose of providing an 'immediately available' court decree via section 10(e) is to serve as a basis for contempt proceedings in the event of a subsequent renewal of the unfair labor practice.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adams Delivery Serv., Inc. (In Re Adams Delivery Serv., Inc.), 24 B.R. 589 (9th Cir. BAP 1982). “The Collier editors concluded that in light of the historical use of “civil action” in connection with § 1441, “It is unlikely, that a ‘civil proceeding’ encompasses, for example, a proceeding before the National Labor Relations Board or other administrative agency.”
Fox Painting Co. & Fox Painting & Decorating, Inc., Cross-Respondents/appellants v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Cross-Applicant/appellee, 16 F.3d 115 (6th Cir. 1994). “Board regulations provide that if the employer “has failed to live up to the terms of the court’s judgment, the General Counsel may, on behalf of the Board, petition the court to hold the respondent in contempt of court.”
NLRB v. Neises Constr. Corporatio (7th Cir. 2023). “We need not reach the merits of this argument because the five- member Board, on whose behalf the petition is filed in the first place, see 29 C.F.R. § 101.15 , formally endorsed seeking con- tempt here.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.