29 C.F.R. § 102.144
Standards for awards
(a) An eligible applicant may receive an award for fees and expenses incurred in connection with an adversary adjudication or in connection with a significant and discrete substantive portion of that proceeding, unless the position of the General Counsel over which the applicant has prevailed was substantially justified. The burden of proof that an award should not be made to an eligible applicant is on the General Counsel, who may avoid an award by showing that the General Counsel's position in the proceeding was substantially justified.
(b) An award will be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or unreasonably protracted the adversary adjudication or if special circumstances make the award sought unjust.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1985–1985 · leading case: Temp Tech Indus., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 756 F.2d 586 (7th Cir. 1985).
Temp Tech Indus., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 756 F.2d 586 (7th Cir. 1985). “” 29 C.F.R. § 102.144 (a) (1984). The Company does not directly challenge the Board’s finding that it prevailed only on the issue of Szkolny’s discharge.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.