C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER I—NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD › PART 102—RULES AND REGULATIONS, SERIES 8 › Subpart C—Procedure Under Section 10(A) to (I) of the Act for the Prevention of Unfair Labor Practices

29 C.F.R. § 102.20

Answer to complaint; time for filing; contents; allegations not denied deemed admitted

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Respondent must, within 14 days from the service of the complaint, file an answer. The Respondent must specifically admit, deny, or explain each of the facts alleged in the complaint, unless the Respondent is without knowledge, in which case the Respondent must so state, such statement operating as a denial. All allegations in the complaint, if no answer is filed, or any allegation in the complaint not specifically denied or explained in an answer filed, unless the Respondent states in the answer that the Respondent is without knowledge, will be deemed to be admitted to be true and will be so found by the Board, unless good cause to the contrary is shown.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1964–1996 · leading case: Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Zeno Table Co., Inc., 610 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Zeno Table Co., Inc., 610 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1980). · cites it 3× “29 C.F.R. § 102.20 (1978). Meanwhile, on August 19, the General Counsel had called Long’s office in Southern California.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dane Cnty. Dairy, 795 F.2d 1313 (7th Cir. 1986). · cites it 2× “The complaint contained a notice of the answer required by 29 C.F.R. 102.20, which provides: “Answer to complaint; time for filing; contents; allegations not denied deemed admitted.”
Kbi Sec. Serv., Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, 91 F.3d 291 (2d Cir. 1996). · cites it 2× “29 C.F.R. § 102.20 . If no answer is filed, “[a]ll allegations in the complaint .”
Harvey Aluminum (Inc.) v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 335 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1964). · cites it 2× “20 (29 C.F.R. 102.20 (1964)) of the Board's rules provides that an answer to a complaint 'shall specifically admit, deny or explain each of the facts alleged in the complaint, unless the respondent is without knowledge, in which case the respondent shall so state, such statement…”
Nat'l Book Consolidators, Inc., in 81-1588 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., in 81-2295 v. Adp Transp. Corp., 672 F.2d 323 (3rd Cir. 1982). · cites it 2× “” 29 C.F.R. § 102.20 (1980). The complaint contained specific directions to the Company to file an answer.”
Mattoon Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 2 v. Illinois Educ. Labor Relations Bd., 550 N.E.2d 610 (Ill. App. Ct. 1990). “” ( 29 C.F.R. §102.20 (1988).) By contrast, the IELRB rule applicable to the present case simply provides failure to file an answer within 15 days after service of a complaint is deemed an admission of the material facts alleged in the complaint and a waiver of a hearing.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Aaron Convalescent Home, 479 F.2d 736 (6th Cir. 1973). “29 C.F.R. §§ 102.20 , 102.21 and 102.24 (1970).”
Harvey Aluminum v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 335 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1964). · cites it 2× “20 ( 29 C.F.R. §102.20 (1964)) of the Boards rules provides that an answer to a complaint shall f l admit, deny or exp am each .”
Father & Sons Lumber & Bldg. Supplies, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 931 F.2d 1093 (6th Cir. 1991). “This policy analogizes well to the explicit statement in 29 C.F.R. § 102.20 that failure to file an answer to a labor-relations complaint within a fourteen-day period after service of the complaint may be excused for good cause.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.