29 C.F.R. § 102.22

Extension of time for filing

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Upon the Regional Director's own motion or upon proper cause shown by any other party, the Regional Director issuing the complaint may by written order extend the time within which the answer must be filed.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1980–1990 · leading case: Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Zeno Table Co., Inc., 610 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1980).
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Zeno Table Co., Inc., 610 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1980). “29 C.F.R. § 102.22 (1978). Zeno was not in default when Long left on vacation.”
Mattoon Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 2 v. Illinois Educ. Labor Relations Bd., 550 N.E.2d 610 (Ill. App. Ct. 1990). “( 29 C.F.R. §102.22 (1988).) Furthermore, if no answer is timely filed, the allegations of the complaint are deemed admitted “unless good cause to the contrary is shown.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.