29 C.F.R. § 102.32

Payment of witness fees and mileage; fees of officer who transcribes deposition or video testimony

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Witnesses summoned before the Administrative Law Judge must be paid the same fees and mileage that are paid witnesses in the courts of the United States, and witnesses whose depositions are taken or who testify by videoconference and the officer who transcribes the testimony shall severally be entitled to the same fees as are paid for like services in the courts of the United States, and those fees shall be paid by the party at whose instance the deposition is taken.

[82 FR 43696, Sept. 19, 2017]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1986–1997 · leading case: Vokas Provision Co., D/B/A the Rich Plan of W. Reserve v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 796 F.2d 864 (6th Cir. 1986).
Vokas Provision Co., D/B/A the Rich Plan of W. Reserve v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 796 F.2d 864 (6th Cir. 1986). · cites it 2× “§ 161 (4); see also 29 C.F.R. § 102.32 (1985). 13 The Board’s regulations provide that “Witness fees and mileage shall be paid by the party at whose instance the witnesses appear____” 29 C.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Frazier, 144 F.R.D. 650 (D.N.J. 1992). · cites it 2× “31 *657 (1992) (providing procedures for NLRB to issue subpoenas ad testificandum); 29 C.F.R. § 102.32 (1992) (providing for payment of fees to witnesses before NLRB).”
Unbelievable, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 118 F.3d 795 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “29 C.F.R. § 102.32 . In short, a charging party need not incur any litigation expense.”
Dep't of Air Force v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 877 F.2d 1036 (D.C. Cir. 1989). “§ 161 (4); 29 C.F.R. § 102.32 (1988); see also Lewis v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.