29 C.F.R. § 102.37

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1981–1991 · leading case: Andrews v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd., 623 P.2d 151 (Cal. 1981).
Andrews v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd., 623 P.2d 151 (Cal. 1981). · cites it 2× “It was not well-written, [3] but apparently the board felt that modeling it on the pertinent NLRB rule ( 29 C.F.R. § 102.37 ) was justifiable. Respondent's arguments persuade me that (1) "[s]ince the .”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bakers of Paris, Inc., 929 F.2d 1427 (9th Cir. 1991). “§§ 144 , 455 (providing for disqualification of federal judges); 29 C.F.R. § 102.37 (providing for disqualification of AUs in Board proceedings), and, second, the constitutional mandate of due process.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sanford Home for Adults, 669 F.2d 35 (2d Cir. 1981). “37 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations, 29 C.F.R. § 102.37 (1981), which requires the parties to file a timely affidavit alleging the grounds for disqualification before an administrative law judge files his decision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.