29 C.F.R. § 102.38
Rights of parties
Any party has the right to appear at the hearing in person, by counsel, or by other representative, to call, examine, and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce into the record documentary or other evidence, except that the Administrative Law Judge may limit the participation of any party as appropriate. Documentary evidence must be submitted in duplicate for the record with a copy to each party.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1966–1990 · leading case: State Bar v. Cramer, 249 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 1976).
State Bar v. Cramer, 249 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 1976). “59; National Labor Relations Board, 29 CFR 102.38. See also Social Security Administration, 20 CFR 416.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966). “Administrative Procedure Act, § 7(c); see also NLRB Rules and Regulations, 29 C.F.R. § 102.38 (1959). Determination of what cross-examination is necessary is within the discretion of the hearing examiner- — but his sound, judicial discretion.”
Kellwood Co., Ottenheimer Bros. Mfg. Div., Peititioern v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Int'l Ladies' Garmentworkers' Union, Afl-Cio, Intervener. Int'l Landies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 411 F.2d 493 (8th Cir. 1969). “29 C.F.R. 102.38 and 101.10(b)(2). He is entitled to be heard by the Examiner and the Board and is entitled to a review of an adverse Board decision by the Court of Appeals.”
Int'l Union of Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers, Afl-Cio v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Tiidee Prods., Inc., Intervenor(two Cases). Tiidee Prods., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Int'l Union of Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor (Two Cases), 502 F.2d 349 (D.C. Cir. 1974). “8 (1973)) permitted fully to litigate the case at the hearing (29 C.F.R. 102.38 (1973)) and before the Board, may file a charge based on totally false facts or raise totally frivolous issues for the purpose of infringing an employer's protected rights and yet, if the Board…”
Int'l Union of Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 502 F.2d 349 (D.C. Cir. 1974). “8 (1973)) permitted fully to litigate the case at the hearing ( 29 C.F.R. § 102.38 (1973)) and before the Board, may file a charge based on totally false facts or raise totally frivolous issues for the purpose of infringing an employer’s protected rights and yet, if the Board…”
Local Union No. 742, United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 377 F.2d 929 (D.C. Cir. 1967). “Series 8, 29 C.F.R. § 102.38 . At the opening of the hearing the Trial Examiner asked counsel and “other representatives for the parties” to state their names.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Washington Heights-West Harlem-Inwood Mental Health Council, Inc., 897 F.2d 1238 (2d Cir. 1990). “See 29 C.F.R. § 102.38 (1989). In a real sense, the Center’s objection — that it was given too much responsibility to present its own case — is that it was afforded too much, not too little, due process.”
Kellwood Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 411 F.2d 493 (8th Cir. 1969). “29 C.F.R. 102.38 and 101.10(b) (2). He is entitled to be heard by the Examiner and the Board and is entitled to a review of an adverse Board decision by the Court of Appeals.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.