29 C.F.R. § 102.49
Modification or setting aside of Board order before record filed in court; action thereafter
Within the limitations of the provisions of Section 10(c) of the Act, and § 102.48, until a transcript of the record in a case is filed in a court, within the meaning of Section 10 of the Act, the Board may at any time upon reasonable notice modify or set aside, in whole or in part, any findings of fact, conclusions of law, or order made or issued by it. Thereafter, the Board may proceed pursuant to § 102.50, insofar as applicable.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1975–2002 · leading case: Raven Servs. Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 315 F.3d 499 (5th Cir. 2002).
Raven Servs. Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 315 F.3d 499 (5th Cir. 2002). “29 C.F.R. § 102.49 (2002) (emphasis added).”
Flav-O-Rich, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 531 F.2d 358 (6th Cir. 1976). “section 160 (d) (1970); 29 C.F.R. 102.49 (1974). Its only relevance to this inquiry is to convincingly demonstrate that the Board has failed to recognize the seriousness of the procedural irregularities which have occurred in this case.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bancroft Mfg. Co., Inc., & Croft Aluminum Co., Inc., 516 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1975). “29 C.F.R. § 102.49 ; see N.L.R.B. v. Con-Pac, Inc.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Con-Pac, Inc., 509 F.2d 270 (5th Cir. 1975). “” 29 C.F.R. § 102.49 . There is no dispute that the Company was given notice of the Board’s reconsideration of its order.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mrs. Gladys Selvin, 527 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir. 1975). “Respondent’s argument that 29 C.F.R. § 102.49 permits the filing of objections with the Board up to the time of the filing of the transcript of the record in the Court of Appeals is also without merit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.