29 C.F.R. § 102.6

Notice to the Administrative Law Judge or Board of supplemental authority

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Pertinent and significant authorities that come to a party's attention after the party's submission to the Administrative Law Judge or the Board has been filed may be brought to the Judge's or the Board's attention by the party promptly filing a letter with the judge or the Board and simultaneously serving all other parties. The body of the letter may not exceed 350 words. A party may file and serve on all other parties a response that is similarly limited. In unfair labor practice cases, the response must be filed no later than 14 days after service of the letter. In representation cases, the response must be filed no later than 7 days after service of the letter. No extension of time will be granted to file the response.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: Int'l Tel. & Tel. Corp., Commc'ns Equip. & Sys. Div. v. Local 134, Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 419 U.S. 428 (1975).
Int'l Tel. & Tel. Corp., Commc'ns Equip. & Sys. Div. v. Local 134, Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 419 U.S. 428 (1975). · cites it 3× “” 29 CFR § 102.6 (1971). A hearing officer “normally is an attorney or field examiner attached to the regional office but may be another qualified official.”
Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. Scott, 583 F. Supp. 78 (D. Nev. 1984). “” 29 C.F.R. § 102.6 . . The Board has not argued that this Court’s § 1331 jurisdiction is foreclosed by the fact that the federal appellate courts have been given jurisdiction to enforce 5 U.”
Vermont Info. Processing, Inc. v. NLRB (D.C. Cir. 2026). “See 29 C.F.R. §§ 102.6 , 102.48 (2024). VIP’s failure to do so renders us “jurisdictionally barred from considering” 7 In critiquing our reliance on Enterprise Leasing, the dissent focuses on an inapposite portion of that opinion addressing the petitioner’s exceptions to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.