29 C.F.R. § 1601.1
Purpose
The regulations set forth in this part contain the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for carrying out its responsibilities in the administration and enforcement of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, and the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. Section 107 of the Americans with Disabilities Act, section 207 of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, and section 104 of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act incorporate the powers, remedies and procedures set forth in sections 705, 706, 707, 709 and 710 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Based on its experience in the enforcement of title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, and the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, and upon its evaluation of suggestions and petitions for amendments submitted by interested persons, the Commission may from time to time amend and revise these procedures.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1971–2024 · leading case: Shikles v. Sprint/United Mgmt. Co., 426 F.3d 1304 (10th Cir. 2005).
Shikles v. Sprint/United Mgmt. Co., 426 F.3d 1304 (10th Cir. 2005). “However, the EEOC conceded in its brief and at oral argument that it has the inherent power in both Title VII/ADA and ADEA cases to dismiss the charge of a noneooperating claimant.”
Cynthia A. Ebbert v. Daimlerchrysler Corp., 319 F.3d 103 (3rd Cir. 2003). “In fact, the only explanation of purpose in the EEOC’s regulations is in 29 C.F.R. § 1601.1 (2002) and it describes the “regulations set forth in this part” as containing the “procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for carrying out its…”
Susie J. Jackson v. Richards Med. Co., 961 F.2d 575 (6th Cir. 1992). “1 of Part 1601 informs us that “[t]he regulations set forth in this part contain the procedures established by the [EEOC] for carrying out its responsibilities in the administration and enforcement of Title VII_” 29 C.F.R. § 1601.1 (1984) (emphasis added).”
16 Fair empl.prac.cas. 396, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8046 Van Davis v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, Etc., Van Davis v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, Etc., 566 F.2d 1334 (9th Cir. 1978). “§ 2000e-5; 29 C.F.R. §§ 1601.1 et seq. Because these barriers tend to eliminate claims that are frivolous or suffering from obvious legal or factual defects, it is not unreasonable to provide that a prima facie case may be established without a showing of discriminatory intent.”
Lewis v. Norfolk S. Corp., 271 F. Supp. 2d 807 (E.D. Va. 2003). “See 29 C.F.R. § 1601.1 (“The regu *815 lations set forth in this part contain the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for carrying out its responsibilities in the administration and enforcement of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and…”
Vanguard Just. Soc'y, Inc. v. Hughes, 471 F. Supp. 670 (D. Maryland 1979). “See 29 C.F.R. § 1601.1 et seq. Section 1601.25b, prior to amendment on September 23, 1977, when the regulations were reorganized and rewritten, read in relevant part: ****** (b) The Commission shall not issue a [right to sue notice] prior to a determination [of reasonable cause]…”
Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees, 851 P.2d 143 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “§ 2000e-2 (1988); 29 C.F.R. §§ 1601.1 et seq. (1991); Ariz.”
Equal Employent Opportunity Comm'n v. City of Memphis, 581 F. Supp. 179 (W.D. Tenn. 1983). “The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation and Orders that the statute of limitations be equitably tolled from March 24, 1983, until the documents sought in the subpoena are made available to the EEOC and that the subpoena duces tecum be enforced.”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Westvaco Corp., 372 F. Supp. 985 (D. Maryland 1974). “Pursuant to the authority contained in Title VII, the EEOC adopted regulations which appear at 29 CFR § 1601.1 et seq., as amended 37 FR 20163 (Sept.”
Canty v. Fry's Elec., Inc., 736 F. Supp. 2d 1352 (N.D. Ga. 2010). “2001) (noting that “[t]he regulations that specify the form and content for a charge with the EEOC under the ADEA nowhere require such a charge to be verified”) with 29 C.F.R. § 1601.1 (“The regulations set forth in this part contain the procedures established by the [EEOC] for…”
Bronze Shields, Inc. v. New Jersey Dep't of Civil Serv., 488 F. Supp. 723 (D.N.J. 1980). “§ 2000e-5; 29 C.F.R. §§ 1601.1 et seq. Because these barriers tend to eliminate claims that are frivolous or suffering from obvious legal or factual defects, it is not unreasonable to provide that a prima facie case may be established without a showing of discriminatory intent.”
Darnell Hilliard v. Paul A. Volcker, Chairman of the Fed. Reserve Bd., 659 F.2d 1125 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “Ill 1979), those functions were transferred to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, effective October 1, 1979. Reorganization Plan No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.