29 C.F.R. § 1601.2
Terms defined in title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, and the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
The terms person, employer, employment agency, labor organization, employee, commerce, industry affecting commerce, State and religion as used in this part shall have the meanings set forth in section 701 of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The term disability shall have the meaning set forth in section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended. The term genetic information shall have the meaning set forth in section 201 of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1975–2002 · leading case: Ebbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 192 F. Supp. 2d 303 (D. Del. 2002).
Ebbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 192 F. Supp. 2d 303 (D. Del. 2002). “1999) (noting that, “[t]he circumstances under which the EEOC may rescind a Right to Sue Letter [are] so circumscribed, that if the rescission is not made pursuant to a reconsideration decision under 29 C.F.R. § 1601.2 , it is deemed to be invalid.”
Dickey v. Greene, 603 F. Supp. 102 (E.D.N.C. 1984). “§ 2000e(b); 29 C.F.R. § 1601.2 . It would certainly be fortunate if aggrieved employees read the wording of the section more broadly to seek the names of every individual and institution discriminating against them, but as the present case illustrates the form is not read in…”
Patton v. Conrad Area Sch. Dist., 388 F. Supp. 410 (D. Del. 1975). “-12(b) (1) (v) outlines the procedure followed by the EEOC if a charge is filed first with the EEOC more than 240 days following the alleged act of discrimination and if there exists a state or local authority to which the charge should otherwise be referred.”
Simler v. Harrison Cnty. Hosp., 110 F. Supp. 2d 886 (S.D. Ind. 2000). “29 C.F.R. § 1601.2 (a)(2). The Seventh Circuit is one of the few courts not to have weighed in on the validity of the regulation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.