C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER XIV—EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION › PART 1601—PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS › Subpart B—Procedure for the Prevention of Unlawful Employment Practices

29 C.F.R. § 1601.24

Conciliation: Procedure and authority

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Where the Commission determines that there is reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice has occurred or is occurring, the Commission shall endeavor to eliminate such practice by informal methods of conference, conciliation and persuasion. In conciliating a case in which a determination of reasonable cause has been made, the Commission shall attempt to achieve a just resolution of all violations found and to obtain agreement that the respondent will eliminate the unlawful employment practice and provide appropriate affirmative relief. Where such conciliation attempts are successful, the terms of the conciliation agreement shall be reduced to writing and shall be signed by the Commission's designated representative and the parties. A copy of the signed agreement shall be sent to the respondent and the person claiming to be aggrieved. Where a charge has been filed on behalf of a person claiming to be aggrieved, the conciliation agreement may be signed by the person filing the charge or by the person on whose behalf the charge was filed.

(b) District Directors; the Director of the Office of Field Programs or the Director of Field Management Programs; or their designees are hereby delegated authority to enter into informal conciliation efforts. District Directors or upon delegation, Field Directors, Area Directors, or Local Directors; the Director of the Office of Field Programs; or the Director of Field Management Programs are hereby delegated the authority to negotiate and sign conciliation agreements. When a suit brought by the Commission is in litigation, the General Counsel is hereby delegated the authority to negotiate and sign conciliation agreements where, pursuant to section 706(f)(1) of title VII, a court has stayed proceedings in the case pending further efforts of the Commission to obtain voluntary compliance.

(c) Proof of compliance with title VII, the ADA, GINA, or the PWFA in accordance with the terms of the agreement shall be obtained by the Commission before the case is closed. In those instances in which a person claiming to be aggrieved or a member of the class claimed to be aggrieved by the practices alleged in the charge is not a party to such an agreement, the agreement shall not extinguish or in any way prejudice the rights of such person to proceed in court under section 706(f)(1) of title VII, the ADA, GINA, or the PWFA.

[42 FR 55388, Oct. 14, 1977, as amended at 48 FR 19165, Apr. 28, 1983; 49 FR 13024, Apr. 2, 1984; 49 FR 13874, Apr. 9, 1984; 52 FR 26959, July 17, 1987; 54 FR 32061, Aug. 4, 1989; 56 FR 9624, 9625, Mar. 7, 1991; 71 FR 26828, May 9, 2006; 74 FR 63982, Dec. 7, 2009; 85 FR 65218, Oct. 15, 2020, 86 FR 2985, Jan. 14, 2021; 89 FR 11169, Feb. 14, 2024; 89 FR 12232, Feb. 16, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2021 · leading case: Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army (2006) ca4 “2d at 1562 ; see also 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24 . If these attempts fail, or if the EEOC has found no reasonable cause, the EEOC issues the employee a right-to-sue letter explaining that he may bring a “civil action” in federal court seeking judicial review of his discrimination claim.”
Karen Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Industries (2013) ca4 “§ 2000e-5(b); 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24 . If the EEOC cannot reach a voluntary settlement with the employer, the agency may file a lawsuit or issue a Notice-of-Right-to-Sue to the employee.”
Dinkins v. Charoen Pokphand USA, Inc. (2001) almd · cites it 2× “” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1601.24 -.25. The court finds that EEOC’s interpretation of the- statute is reasonable.”
Tia J. Horton, and Karen Brooks, Proposed Intervenor v. Jackson County Board of County Commissioners (2003) ca7 “” 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24 (a). In the past five years, conciliation has been successful in approximately 25 percent of the Title VII charges in which the Commission made a “reasonable cause” determination.”
Bryant v. Better Business Bureau of Greater Maryland, Inc. (1996) mdd “29 C.F.R. § 1601.24 . Moreover, the administrative charge provides the agency with notice of what it is to investigate and respondents with formal notice of the alleged practices they are called upon to defend.”
Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (2018) ca7 “24"> 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24 , and that the Commission "may bring a civil action against any respondent named in a charge" only if conciliation has failed, <extracted-citation index="74" url="https://cite.”
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lutheran Social Services (1999) cadc “, 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24 (a) (“Where the Commission determines that there is reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice has occurred or is occurring, the Commission shall endeavor to eliminate such practice by informal methods of conference, conciliation and…”
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Caterpillar, Inc., Defendant-Petitioner (2005) ca7 “§ 2000e-5(b); 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24 , would be by-passed, in derogation of the statutory scheme.”
Lawrence Ellis MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald DEVINE, Director of the Office of Personnel Management, Et Al., Def (1986) ca11 “29 C.F.R. § 1601.24 (a). If conciliation fails, the EEOC issues to the employee a notice of right to sue pursuant to § 1601.”
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (2015) ca7 “” 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24 (a). The regulations further provide that the EEOC may bring a civil action only if it is unable to secure “a conciliation agreement acceptable to the [EEOC].”
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Philip Services Corp. (2011) ca5 “See 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24 (a) (“Where such conciliation attempts are successful, the terms of the conciliation agreement shall be reduced to writing and shall be signed by the Commission’s designated representative and the parties.”
Beck v. Figeac Aero N. Am., Inc. (2019) ksd · cites it 2× “24"> 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24 (a) the EEOC must attempt to eliminate discriminatory employment conduct by conference, conciliation, and persuasion before bringing a lawsuit against an employer.”
Show all 30 citing cases →
— 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24(d)(4) — 1 case
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Route 22 Sports Bar, Inc. (2021) wvnd
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.