C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER XIV—EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION › PART 1601—PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS › Subpart B—Procedure for the Prevention of Unlawful Employment Practices

29 C.F.R. § 1601.25

Failure of conciliation; notice

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Where the Commission is unable to obtain voluntary compliance as provided by title VII, the ADA, GINA, or the PWFA and it determines that further efforts to do so would be futile or nonproductive, it shall, through the appropriate District Director, the Director of the Office of Field Programs, or Director of Field Management Programs, or their designees, so notify the respondent in writing.

[42 FR 55388, Oct. 14, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 46275, Oct. 18, 1982; 54 FR 32061, Aug. 4, 1989; 56 FR 9624, Mar. 7, 1991; 71 FR 26829, May 9, 2006; 74 FR 63982, Dec. 7, 2009; 89 FR 11169, Feb. 14, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 53 cases, 1969–2012 · leading case: Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 505 F.2d 610 (5th Cir. 1975).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 505 F.2d 610 (5th Cir. 1975). · cites it 4× “2000e-5(f)(1) (1974), 29 C.F.R. 1601.25 (1972). On July 16, 1973, the Commission brought this action in the district court, which held that Section 706(f)(1) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. North Hills Passavant Hosp., 544 F.2d 664 (3d Cir. 1976). · cites it 3× “On September 20, 1974, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1601.25 (1974), the EEOC informed North Hills’ attorney that conciliation had failed.”
Minor v. Northville Pub. Schs., 605 F. Supp. 1185 (E.D. Mich. 1985). · cites it 3× “Despite the provision in the statute relating to the responsibility of the Attorney General in actions against a government employer, the pertinent regulations enacted in response to the amendments, 29 C.F.R. § 1601.25 (1972) provided: In any instance in which the Commission is…”
Camack v. Hardee's Food Sys., Inc., 410 F. Supp. 469 (M.D.N.C. 1976). · cites it 4× “See 29 C.F.R. § 1601.25 . On December 6, 1974, plaintiff appeared at the office of the Clerk of Court in Greensboro, North Carolina, with the EEOC papers and requested the appointment of an attorney.”
Melvin D. GARNER v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & Co., 538 F.2d 611 (4th Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “stly, the express words and the implications of the letter merely indicate that up to now the conciliation efforts have been unsuccessful, without going so far as to notify the aggrieved party that a "conciliation agreement" is, in the Commission's judgment, not going to be…”
Hochstadt v. Worcester Found. for Experimental Biology, Inc., 425 F. Supp. 318 (D. Mass. 1976). “1975); see also 29 C.F.R. § 1601.25 (1974). *321 (f)(2) Whenever a charge is filed with the Commission and the Commission concludes on the basis of a preliminary investigation that prompt judicial action is necessary to carry out the purposes of this Act, the Commission .”
Gloria ZAMBUTO v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 544 F.2d 1333 (5th Cir. 1977). “29 C.F.R. § 1601.25 (1974) requires that the notice also contain: (1) A copy of the charge.”
Melvin W. Coles v. Gen. Howard W. Penny, 531 F.2d 609 (D.C. Cir. 1976). “Of interest to us is the provision codified as 29 C.F.R. § 1601.25 (a)(3) (1975), which requires that the notice to the aggrieved party re *613 quired by the Act must include “[ajdvice concerning his or her rights to proceed in court under Section 706(f)(1) of Title VII.”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Klingler Elec. Corp., 636 F.2d 104 (5th Cir. 1981). “29 C.F.R. 1601.25 (1977). At Klingler’s request, negotiations were resumed.”
Samuel Culpepper v. Reynolds Metals Co., 421 F.2d 888 (5th Cir. 1970). “2d 283 (1969), a charging party may request under Commission Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1601.25 (a) a notice of the right to sue at any time after 60 days has elapsed from the filing of a charge with the Commission.”
Victoria MISSIRLIAN v. HUNTINGTON Mem'l Hosp., 662 F.2d 546 (9th Cir. 1981). · cites it 2× “” 29 C.F.R. § 1601.25 (a)(3) (1975). This advice was generally provided in the form of a “Notice of Right to Sue.”
Leo Rosen v. Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., 409 F.2d 775 (3d Cir. 1969). · cites it 2× “3), the Commission notified appellants, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1601.25 (b), that they had thirty days in which to institute suit.”
Show all 53 citing cases →
29 C.F.R. § 1601.25(a): 1 case
2 Fair empl.prac.cas. 881 v. Local No. 6, 431 F.2d 205 (7th Cir. 1970).
29 C.F.R. § 1601.25(a)(3): 1 case
Victoria MISSIRLIAN v. HUNTINGTON Mem'l Hosp., 662 F.2d 546 (9th Cir. 1981). “” 29 C.F.R. § 1601.25 (a)(3) (1975). This advice was generally provided in the form of a “Notice of Right to Sue.”
29 C.F.R. § 1601.25(b): 1 case
Leo Rosen v. Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., 409 F.2d 775 (3d Cir. 1969). “3), the Commission notified appellants, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1601.25 (b), that they had thirty days in which to institute suit.”
29 C.F.R. § 1601.25(c): 1 case
King v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 476 F. Supp. 495 (N.D. Ill. 1978).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.