C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER XIV—EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION › PART 1601—PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS › Subpart G—FEP Agency Designation Procedures

29 C.F.R. § 1601.78

Evaluation of designated FEP agencies certified by the Commission

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

To assure that designated FEP agencies certified by the Commission, as provided in § 1601.75 of this part, continue to maintain performance consistent with the Commission's Substantial Weight Review Procedures, the Commission shall provide for the evaluation of such agencies as follows:

(a) Each designated FEP agency certified by the Commission shall be evaluated at least once every 3 years; and

(b) Each designated FEP agency certified by the Commission shall be evaluated when, as a result of a substantial weight review requested as provided in § 1601.76 of this part or required in regard to cases closed as a result of unsuccessful conciliation or for lack of jurisdiction as provided in § 1601.77 of this part, the Commission rejects more than 5% of a designated FEP agency's findings at the end of the year or 20% or more of its findings for two consecutive quarters. When the Commission rejects 20% or more of a designated FEP agency's findings during any quarter, the Commission shall initiate an inquiry and may conduct an evaluation.

(c) The Commission may, on its own motion, require an evaluation at any time.

[46 FR 50367, Oct. 13, 1981. Redesignated at 56 FR 9625, Mar. 7, 1991; 85 FR 65219, Oct. 15, 2020]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Connecticut Jud. Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (Conn. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Connecticut Jud. Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (Conn. 2022). “29 C.F.R. § 1601.78 (2020). In addition, federal regulations require that, for cases processed under contract with the EEOC, the EEOC ‘‘shall review charges closed by the certified [fair employment practices] agency for lack of jurisdiction .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.