29 C.F.R. § 1601.8
Where to make a charge
A charge may be made using the EEOC's designated digital systems, in person, by facsimile, or by mail to any EEOC office or to any designated representative of the Commission. The addresses of the EEOC's offices appear at www.eeoc.gov.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1970–2024 · leading case: Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stand. BRANDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, 431 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1970).
Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stand. BRANDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, 431 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1970). “' 29 C.F.R. 1601.8. The same regulation announces that 'charge forms are available to all persons from all offices of the Commission.”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n, Appellant, v. Gen. Elec. Co., Appellee, 532 F.2d 359 (4th Cir. 1976). “That charge also referred to racial discrimination and has no relevance here since the EEOC’s finding of sex discrimination is based solely upon the record made in investigating Slaughter’s claim.”
Laouini v. CLM Freight Lines, Inc., 586 F.3d 473 (7th Cir. 2009). “CLM does not cite any regulation prohibiting fax filing (there is none), but cites instead to 29 C.F.R. § 1601.8 , which governs where a charge of discrimination may be filed and says only that a charge “may be made in person or by mail at any office of the Commission or with…”
Jeffrey L. SOFFERIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Am. AIRLINES, INC., D.J. Nelson & H.R. Tourtellott, Defendants-Appellees, 923 F.2d 552 (7th Cir. 1991). “See 29 C.F.R. § 1601.8 (“A charge may be made in person or by mail at the offices of the Commission in Washington, D.”
Lopez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 493 F. Supp. 801 (D. Maryland 1980). “Specifically, 29 CFR § 1601.8 allows a charge to “be made in person or by mail”.”
Adams v. Cal-Ark Int'l, Inc., 159 F. Supp. 2d 402 (E.D. Tex. 2001). “” 29 C.F.R. § 1601.8 . Further, charges are considered filed with the EEOC upon receipt.”
Johnson v. Host Enter., Inc., 470 F. Supp. 381 (E.D. Pa. 1979). “29 C.F.R. § 1601.8 (1978). The timeliness of filings, however, is determined by the date on which the charge is received by the EEOC.”
Freeman v. CSX Transp. Co., 730 F. Supp. 1084 (M.D. Ala. 1989). “” 29 C.F.R. § 1601.8 . 6 . The court expresses no view as to what its conclusion would have been had Freeman’s counsel been able to provide some reasonable justification as to why he filed the discrimination charge with the Florida Commission on Human Rights.”
Silver v. Mohasco Corp., 497 F. Supp. 1 (N.D.N.Y. 1978). “It should be noted that the EEOC does not appear to have requested plaintiff to provide it with a formal and verified Title VII charge as required by regulation, see 29 C.F.R. §§ 1601.8 , 1601.11 (1977), but rather apparently treated plaintiff’s letter received by the EEOC on…”
McAdams v. Reno, 858 F. Supp. 945 (D. Minnesota 1994). “§ 2000e-5(b); 29 C.F.R. § 1601.8 , or a comparable state organization, 42 U.”
Stewart v. Core Labs., Inc., 460 F. Supp. 931 (N.D. Tex. 1978). “” 29 CFR § 1601.8 . That shortly thereafter amendments to the regulations occurred which provided that “the charge shall be in writing and signed and shall be verified.”
Cole v. Mountain View Mktg., Inc., 744 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (S.D. Ala. 2010). “All this is clearly beyond Cole’s control. As to where to file a charge, the regulations state simply that a “charge may be made in person or by mail at any office of the Commission or with any designated representative of the Commission.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.