C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER XIV—EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION › PART 1601—PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS › Subpart G—FEP Agency Designation Procedures

29 C.F.R. § 1601.80

Certified designated FEP agencies

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The designated FEP agencies receiving certification by the Commission are as follows:

Alaska Commission for Human Rights Alexandria (VA) Human Rights Office Anchorage (AK) Equal Rights Commission Arizona Civil Rights Division Arlington County (VA) Human Rights Commission Austin Human Relations Commission Baltimore (MD) Community Relations Commission Broward County (FL) Human Relations Commission California Department of Fair Employment and Housing City of Tampa Office of Human Rights Clearwater (FL) Office of Community Relations Colorado Civil Rights Division Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunity Corpus Christi (TX) Human Relations Commission Dade County (FL) Fair Housing and Employment Commission Delaware Department of Labor District of Columbia Office of Human Rights East Chicago (IN) Human Rights Commission Fairfax County (VA) Human Rights Commission Florida Commission on Human Rights Fort Wayne (IN) Metropolitan Human Relations Commission Fort Worth (TX) Human Relations Commission Gary (IN) Human Relations Commission Georgia Commission on Equal Opportunity Hawaii Department of Labor and Industrial Relations Howard County (MD) Office of Human Rights Idaho Human Rights Commission Illinois Department of Human Rights Indiana Civil Rights Commission Iowa Civil Rights Commission Jacksonville (FL) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Kansas Commission on Civil Rights Lee County Office of Equal Opportunity Lexington-Fayette (KY) Urban County Human Rights Commission Louisville and Jefferson County Human Relations Commission Madison Equal Opportunity Commission Maine Human Rights Commission Maryland Commission on Human Relations Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination Michigan Department of Civil Rights Minneapolis (MN) Department of Civil Rights Minnesota Department of Human Rights Missouri Commission on Civil Rights Montana Human Rights Division Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission Nevada Commission on Equal Rights of Citizens New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights New Hanover Human Relations Commission New Jersey Division on Civil Rights New Mexico Human Rights Commission New York City (NY) Commission on Human Rights New York State Division on Human Rights North Carolina Civil Rights Division, Office of Administrative Hearings North Dakota Department of Labor Ohio Civil Rights Commission Oklahoma Human Rights Commission Omaha (NE) Human Relations Department Oregon Bureau of Labor Orlando (FL) Human Relations Department Palm Beach County Office of Equal Opportunity Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations Puerto Rico Department of Labor and Human Resources Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights St. Louis (MO) Civil Rights Enforcement Agency St. Paul Department of Human Rights St. Petersburg (FL) Human Relations Department Seattle (WA) Human Rights Commission South Bend (IN) Human Rights Commission South Carolina Human Affairs Commission South Dakota Division of Human Rights Tacoma (WA) Human Relations Division Tennessee Human Rights Commission Texas Commission on Human Rights Utah Industrial Commission, Anti-Discrimination Division Vermont Attorney General's Office, Civil Rights Division Virgin Islands Department of Labor Washington Human Rights Commission West Virginia Human Rights Commission Wisconsin Equal Rights Division, Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations Wyoming Fair Employment Practices Commission(42 U.S.C. 2000e—12(a)) [46 FR 50367, Oct. 13, 1981. Redesignated at 56 FR 9625, Mar. 7, 1991] Editorial Note:For Federal Register citations affecting § 1601.80, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at www.govinfo.gov.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1984–2022 · leading case: Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Dolgencorp, LLC, 899 F.3d 428 (6th Cir. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Dolgencorp, LLC, 899 F.3d 428 (6th Cir. 2018). “See 29 C.F.R. § 1601.80 . Dollar General counters that the Tennessee Commission does not qualify because some federal and state courts have refused to recognize a reasonable accommodations theory under the Tennessee Act.”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Navy Fed. Credit Union, 424 F.3d 397 (4th Cir. 2005). “See 29 C.F.R. § 1601.80 . 16 . That the EEOC and the FCHRC operate autonomously is further demonstrated by their handling of the Simms matter.”
Williams v. GEICO CORP., 792 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2011). “Because his claim arose in Maryland and because that state has a qualified agency to process employment discrimination claims for disability, see 29 C.F.R. § 1601.80 (designating the Maryland Commission on Human Relations as certified by the EEOC), Williams is entitled to the…”
Laouini v. CLM Freight Lines, Inc., 586 F.3d 473 (7th Cir. 2009). “Discussion Before bringing a lawsuit under Title VII, Laouini was required to file a charge of discrimination with the EEOC. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(l).”
Cynthia Gilardi v. Gary Schroeder, D/B/A Gary Schroeder Trucking, 833 F.2d 1226 (7th Cir. 1987). “68, § 7-101, and 29 C.F.R. § 1601.80 , and therefore it is considered a “deferral” state whose residents are not required to file with the EEOC until 300 days after the act of discrimination so long as they meet the statutory prerequisite for the extended filing period.”
Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. Comm'n v. Crawford, 511 A.2d 1079 (Md. 1986). “Under the statutory deferral procedure, initial charges are to be filed directly with approved state or local authorities, 42 U.”
Nicol v. Imagematrix, Inc., 767 F. Supp. 744 (E.D. Va. 1991). “Because the FCHRC is a certified § 706 agency, see 29 C.F.R. § 1601.80 (1990), Title VII requires the EEOC to defer initial investigation of discrimination claims to the FCHRC.”
Herbert v. Sebelius, 925 F. Supp. 2d 13 (D.D.C. 2013). “Because Herbert’s claim arose in Georgia and that state has a qualified agency to process employment discrimination claims for disability, see 29 C.F.R. § 1601.80 (designating the Georgia Commission on Equal Opportunity as certified by the EEOC), Herbert is subject to the…”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Bloomberg L.P., 751 F. Supp. 2d 628 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). “In New York, where the EEOC filed its charges, there is a state agency with jurisdiction to seek or grant relief on sex discrimination claims, 29 C.F.R. § 1601.80 , so the 300-day filing period is the relevant time period in this case.”
Pacourek v. Inland Steel Co., 858 F. Supp. 1393 (N.D. Ill. 1994). “Indeed, in the Complaint plaintiff pleads only that she filed a charge directly with the EEOC, and accordingly invokes the 180-day statute of limitations.”
Teague v. Nw. Mem'l Hosp., 492 F. App'x 680 (7th Cir. 2012). “§§ 12117 (a), 2000e-5(e)(l); 29 C.F.R. § 1601.80 ; Sharp v. United Airlines, Inc.”
Ahuja v. Bae Sys. Info. Solutions, Inc., 873 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2012). “§ 2000e-5(c); 29 C.F.R. § 1601.80 . Later that same day, the Investigator e-mailed Plaintiff a copy of the ACHRC’s Intake Questionnaire.”
Show all 42 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.