Only the following may be relied upon as a “written interpretation or opinion of the Commission” within the meaning of section 713 of title VII:
(a) A letter entitled “opinion letter” and signed by the Legal Counsel on behalf of and as approved by the Commission, or, if issued in the conduct of litigation, by the General Counsel on behalf of and as approved by the Commission, or
(b) Matter published and specifically designated as such in the Federal Register, including the Commission's Guidelines on Affirmative Action, or
(c) A Commission determination of no reasonable cause, issued, under the circumstances described in § 1608.10 (a) or (b) of the Commission's Guidelines on Affirmative Action, 29 CFR part 1608, when such determination contains a statement that it is a “written interpretation or opinion of the Commission.”
[49 FR 31411, Aug. 7, 1984. Redesignated at 56 FR 9626, Mar. 7, 1991]
Notes of Decisions
Chris R. Plott v. Gen. Motors Corp., Packard Elec. Div., 71 F.3d 1190 (6th Cir. 1995).
“, or any of [its] officers, agents or employees, that is or shall be taken in a good faith attempt to comply with the affirmative action or other provisions of the Conciliation Agreement .”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Walgreen Co., 34 F. Supp. 3d 1049 (N.D. Cal. 2014).
· cites it 2× “In response, and pursuant to their request for judicial notice, the EEOC relies on 29 C.F.R. § 1601.93 which defines what documents can be relied on for purposes of establishing a “written interpretation or opinion of the Commission” pursuant to section 713 of Title VII (42 U.”
Cole v. Gen. Motors Corp., 600 N.W.2d 421 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “The court further held that the plaintiff's claim was barred under subsection 713(b) of title VII because General Motors made its decision in a good-faith attempt to comply with the terms of the agreement and in reliance on the EEOC opinion letter's assurance that actions taken…”
Hall v. Sheppard Pratt Health Sys., Inc. (D. Maryland 2024).
· cites it 3× “29 C.F.R. § 1601.93 . Neither of the sources Sheppard Pratt relies on are EEOC “opinions” or “determination[s] of no reasonable cause.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.