29 C.F.R. § 1606.2
Scope of title VII protection
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, protects individuals against employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The title VII principles of disparate treatment and adverse impact equally apply to national origin discrimination. These Guidelines apply to all entities covered by title VII (collectively referred to as “employer”).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: West Virginia Univ./West Virginia Bd. of Regents v. Decker, 447 S.E.2d 259 (W. Va. 1994).
West Virginia Univ./West Virginia Bd. of Regents v. Decker, 447 S.E.2d 259 (W. Va. 1994). “Section 703(k)(l)(A) which was added by the 1991 amendment states that: "An unlawful employment practice based on disparate impact is established under this title only if (i) a complaining party demonstrates that a respondent uses a particular employment practice that causes a…”
Beck v. Figeac Aero N. Am., Inc., 382 F. Supp. 3d 1170 (D. Kan. 2019). “29 C.F.R. § 1606.2 ; 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a), (b) ; K.”
Sarin v. Raytheon Co., 905 F. Supp. 49 (D. Mass. 1995). “29 C.F.R. § 1606.2 (West 1995). Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 151B, § 4(1) provides that it is unlawful [f]or an employer, by himself or his agent, because of the .”
Lopez v. COMPA Indus., Inc. (D.N.M. 2023). “29 C.F.R. § 1606.2 . Proceeding in forma pauperis Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis.”
McKinzie v. Bank of Am. (D.N.M. 2025). “p. 2). “Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, protects individuals against employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.