(a) Each agency subject to this part shall adopt procedures for processing individual and class complaints of discrimination that include the provisions contained in §§ 1614.105 through 1614.110 and in § 1614.204, and that are consistent with all other applicable provisions of this part and the instructions for complaint processing contained in the Commission's Management Directives.
(b) The Commission shall periodically review agency resources and procedures to ensure that an agency makes reasonable efforts to resolve complaints informally, to process complaints in a timely manner, to develop adequate factual records, to issue decisions that are consistent with acceptable legal standards, to explain the reasons for its decisions, and to give complainants adequate and timely notice of their rights.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2022 · leading case:
Licudine v. Winter, 603 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2009).
Licudine v. Winter, 603 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2009).
· cites it 2× “See 29 C.F.R. 1614.104. This office has processed your client’s pre-complaint as required.”
Hollingsworth v. Duff, 444 F. Supp. 2d 61 (D.D.C. 2006).
“Hollingsworth cites 29 C.F.R. § 1614.104 in her opposition, Pl.”
Mullins v. Crowell, 74 F. Supp. 2d 1067 (N.D. Ala. 1999).
“See also 29 C.F.R. § 1614.104 . Although circuit courts have split on the issue, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has stated that, as with claims brought under section 501, claims brought against federal agencies under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act must satisfy the…”
Licudine v. Winter (D.D.C. 2009).
· cites it 2× “See 29 CFR 1614.104. This office has processed your client’s pre- complaint as required.”
McKelvey v. DeJoy (D. Conn. 2022).
“103 (b)(3); 29 C.F.R. § 1614.104 (a) (2022). The parties do not dispute that Ms.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.