C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER XVII—OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › PART 1910—OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS › Subpart B—Adoption and Extension of Established Federal Standards

29 C.F.R. § 1910.11

Scope and purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The provisions of this subpart B adopt and extend the applicability of, established Federal standards in effect on April 28, 1971, with respect to every employer, employee, and employment covered by the Act.

(b) It bears emphasis that only standards (i.e., substantive rules) relating to safety or health are adopted by any incorporations by reference of standards prescribed elsewhere in this chapter or this title. Other materials contained in the referenced parties are not adopted. Illustrations of the types of materials which are not adopted are these. The incorporations by reference of parts 1915, 1916, 1917, 1918 in §§ 1910.13, 1910.14, 1910.15, and 1910.16 are not intended to include the discussion in those parts of the coverage of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act or the penalty provisions of the Act. Similarly, the incorporation by reference of part 1926 in § 1910.12 is not intended to include references to interpretative rules having relevance to the application of the Construction Safety Act, but having no relevance to the application to the Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1975–2020 · leading case: George v. Myers
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
George v. Myers (2000) orctapp · cites it 3× “Among those provisions Oregon adopted were 29 CFR sections 1910.11 and 1910.12, as well as most of 29 CFR Part 1926, including those provisions incorporated in Subpart A and B, which were not adopted under OSHA.”
Slingluff v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission (2005) ca10 “451 ; 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.11 , 1910.12. Mr. Slingluff timely contested the citation on June 18, 2003, see 29 U.”
Kiewit Power Constructors Co. v. Secretary of Labor (2020) cadc “” 29 C.F.R. § 1910.11 (a). Because § 1910.11 is itself codified in Subpart B, the Secretary contends it is made operative, by its own terms, to all established Federal standards, including Walsh-Healey standards, thereby extending such standards to every employer covered by the…”
Bechtel Power Corporation v. Secretary of Labor (1977) ca8 “29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.11 (b) and 1910.-12(c).”
Pozzi v. McGee Associates, Inc. (1992) illappct “The specific regulations at issue are 29 C.F.R. §§1910.11 , 1910.12, and 1926.450 (1983).”
Ch2m Hill, Inc. v. Alexis Herman, Secretary of Labor, and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (1999) ca7 “29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.11 (b) & .12(c); see also Underhill, 526 F.”
Underhill Construction Corporation v. Secretary of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (1975) ca2 “10468-69; 29 C.F.R. § 1910.11 (a) (emphasis supplied).”
Dravo Corp. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission (1980) ca3 “, 29 C.F.R. § 1910.11 (b), entitled “Scope and purpose,” under “Subpart B— Adoption and Extension of Established Federal Standards,” which provides in pertinent part: It bears emphasis that only standards (i.”
Elaine Chao v. Summit Contractors (2009) ca8 “See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.11 , 1910.12(c) (discussing which parts U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.