29 C.F.R. § 1915.1
Purpose and authority
The provisions in this part constitute safety and health regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to section 41 of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 941) and occupational safety and health standards issued by the Secretary pursuant to section 6 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 655).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1974–1981 · leading case: Anthony J. Melerine, Jr., Cont'l Ins. Co., Intervenor-Appellant v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 659 F.2d 706 (5th Cir. 1981).
Anthony J. Melerine, Jr., Cont'l Ins. Co., Intervenor-Appellant v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 659 F.2d 706 (5th Cir. 1981). “The regulation that gives OSHA accreditation to these and other LHWCA regulations states: “Each employer shall protect the employment and places of employment of each of his employees engaged in ship repair or a related employment, by complying with the appropriate standards…”
James T. CLARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCEAN DRILLING & Expl. CO., Defendant-Appellee, 609 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir. 1980). “15 ; ship repairing, 29 C.F.R. §§ 1915.1 , 1915.51(a); and shipbuilding, 29 C.”
Hite v. Mar. Overseas Corp., 375 F. Supp. 233 (E.D. Tex. 1974). “§ 941 (1970) ; 29 C.F.R. 1915.1 to 1922.1 et seq. 15 . 3 U.”
Stockstill v. Gypsum Transp., 607 F.2d 1112 (5th Cir. 1979). “” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1915.1 (c) & (d) and 1915.2(c).”
Ryder v. United States, 513 F. Supp. 551 (D. Mass. 1981). “See, 29 C.F.R. § 1915.1 (d). 18 As discussed infra, at 561, there was ample evidence presented at trial of the existence of a duty, imposed by custom and practice upon shipowners, to provide for the safety of workers by isolating, locking, and/or tagging any valves which might…”
Gary v. N. Barge Line Co., 440 F. Supp. 260 (E.D. La. 1977). “Pursuant to provisions of 29 CFR 1915.1 et seq., Avon-dale had appointed a “competent person” 6 to conduct daily tests and inspections of vessels and to complete a U.”
Hill v. Texaco, Inc., 499 F. Supp. 470 (S.D. Tex. 1980). “29 C.F.R. § 1915.1 (d) (1979). . It has come to the court’s attention that at trial it erroneously stated the amount of indemnification as $44,726.”
— 29 C.F.R. § 1915.1(a) — 1 case
Gary v. N. Barge Line Co., 440 F. Supp. 260 (E.D. La. 1977). “Pursuant to provisions of 29 CFR 1915.1 et seq., Avon-dale had appointed a “competent person” 6 to conduct daily tests and inspections of vessels and to complete a U.”
— 29 C.F.R. § 1915.1(c) — 1 case
Gary v. N. Barge Line Co., 440 F. Supp. 260 (E.D. La. 1977). “Pursuant to provisions of 29 CFR 1915.1 et seq., Avon-dale had appointed a “competent person” 6 to conduct daily tests and inspections of vessels and to complete a U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.