29 C.F.R. § 2200.5

Extension of time

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Commission or the Judge on their own initiative or, upon motion of a party, for good cause shown, may enlarge or shorten any time prescribed by these rules or prescribed by an order. All such motions shall be in writing and shall conform with § 2200.40, but, in exigent circumstances in a case pending before a Judge, an oral request may be made and shall be followed by a written motion filed with the Judge within such time as the Judge prescribes. A request for an extension of time should be received in advance of the date on which the pleading or document is due to be filed. However, in exigent circumstances, an extension of time may be granted even though the request was filed after the designated time for filing has expired. In such circumstances, the party requesting the extension must show, in writing, the reasons for the party's failure to make the request before the time prescribed for the filing had expired. The motion may be acted upon before the time for response has expired.

Notes of Decisions
United States of America, by Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, Plaintiff v. Howard Electric Company, a Corporation (1986) 10th Cir. “The Secretary never sought leave to file a late pleading as required by 29 C.F.R. § 2200.5 because he believed that the initial stay was to apply indefinitely.”
Jensen Construction Co. of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission (1979) 10th Cir. “29 C.F.R. § 2200.5 . Requests for extensions of time for the filing of any pleading or document must be received in advance of the date on which the pleading or document is due to be filed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.