29 C.F.R. § 2200.66

Transcript of testimony

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Hearings. Hearings shall be transcribed verbatim. A copy of the transcript of testimony taken at the hearing, duly certified by the reporter, shall be filed with the Judge before whom the matter was heard.

(b) Payment for transcript. The Commission shall bear all expenses for court reporters' fees and for copies of the hearing transcript received by it. Each party is responsible for securing and paying for its copy of the transcript.

(c) Correction of errors. Error in the transcript of the hearing may be corrected by the Judge on the Judge's own motion, on joint motion by the parties, or on motion by any party. The motion shall conform to § 2200.40 and shall state the error in the transcript and the correction to be made. The official transcript shall reflect the corrections.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1974–1976 · leading case: Stockwell Mfg. Co. v. William J. Usery, Sec'y of Labor, United States Dep't of Labor, 536 F.2d 1306 (10th Cir. 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Stockwell Mfg. Co. v. William J. Usery, Sec'y of Labor, United States Dep't of Labor, 536 F.2d 1306 (10th Cir. 1976). “29 C.F.R. § 2200.66 provides, in part: “It shall be the duty of the judge to conduct a fair and impartial hearing, to assure that the facts are fully elicited to adjudicate all issues and avoid delay.”

Peter J. Brennan, Sec'y of Labor v. Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n & S. J. Otinger, Jr., Constr. Co., 502 F.2d 30 (5th Cir. 1974). “76 , the ALJ shall render his decision and file his report with the Commission. 29. CFR § 2200.-90.”

Felton Constr. Co., a Corp. v. Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 518 F.2d 49 (9th Cir. 1975). “Rule 66 of the Commission’s Rules of Procedure, 29 C.F.R. § 2200.66 , provides in pertinent part: “It shall be the duty of the judge to conduct a fair and impartial hearing, to assure that the facts are fully elicited, to adjudicate all issues and avoid delay.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.