29 C.F.R. § 30.15

Enforcement actions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Where the Registration Agency, as a result of a compliance review, complaint investigation, or other reason, determines that the sponsor is not operating its apprenticeship program in accordance with this part, the Registration Agency must notify the sponsor in writing of the specific violation(s) identified and may:

(a) Offer the sponsor technical assistance to promote compliance with this part.

(b) Suspend the sponsor's right to register new apprentices if the sponsor fails to implement a compliance action plan to correct the specific violation(s) identified within 30 business days from the date the sponsor is so notified of the violation(s), or, if the sponsor submits a written response to the findings of noncompliance, fails to implement a compliance action plan within 30 days of receiving the Registration Agency's notice upholding its initial noncompliance findings. If the sponsor has not implemented a compliance action plan within 30 business days of notification of suspension, the Registration Agency may institute proceedings to deregister the program in accordance with the deregistration proceedings set forth in part 29 of this chapter, or if the Registration Agency does not institute such proceedings within 45 days of the start of the suspension, the suspension is lifted.

(1) Referral to the EEOC;

(2) Referral to an appropriate State fair employment practice agency; or

(3) Referral to the Department's OFCCP.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1982–2010 · leading case: S. California Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractor Inc. v. California Apprenticeship Council, 841 P.2d 1011 (Cal. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

S. California Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractor Inc. v. California Apprenticeship Council, 841 P.2d 1011 (Cal. 1992). “1 l(b)-(f) (1992)); and enforce equal opportunity plans ( 29 C.F.R. § 30.15 (1992)). 6 The Bureau and the Division coordinate their California activities under a “State of California Cooperative Working Agreement.”

Taylor v. United States Dep't of Labor, 552 F. Supp. 728 (E.D. Pa. 1982). · cites it 2× “9 , the Labor Department is responsible for conducting compliance reviews of the registered apprenticeship programs and their sponsors.”

Tri-m Grp., LLC v. Sharp, 705 F. Supp. 2d 335 (D. Del. 2010). “See 29 C.F.R. § 30.15 (a)(1). The Office of Apprenticeship (“OA”) of the USDOL, in conducting a compliance review in this regard, 10 identified in June 2008 that “Delaware’s apprenticeship law” did not conform to 29 C.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.