C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER III—NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD › PART 301—RULES OF PROCEDURE

29 C.F.R. § 301.6

General

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) To conserve time and expedite proceedings all parties within the scope of the Adjustment Board should prepare submissions in such manner that the pertinent and related facts and all supporting data bearing upon the dispute will be fully set forth, thus obviating the need of lengthy briefs and unnecessary oral discussions.

(b) All submissions shall be typewritten or machine prepared, addressed to the Secretary of the appropriate Division of the Adjustment Board, and fifteen copies thereof filed by the petitioner or petitioners.

(c) Parties to a dispute are required to state in all submissions whether or not an oral hearing is desired.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1966–2018 · leading case: J. W. Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco R.R. Co., 361 F.2d 946 (1st Cir. 1966).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
J. W. Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco R.R. Co., 361 F.2d 946 (1st Cir. 1966). “" 29 CFR 301.6(c). 5 The Adjustment Board's opinion and award, rendered on December 14, 1961, framed these issues as follows: "In order to sustain the claim we must find that the carrier acted arbitrarily and without sufficient evidence to sustain its decision, and furthermore,…”
Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco R.R., 361 F.2d 946 (7th Cir. 1966). “” 29 CFR 301.6(c). . The Adjustment Board’s opinion and award, rendered on December 14, 1961, framed these issues as follows: “In order to sustain the claim we must find that the carrier acted arbitrarily and without sufficient evidence to sustain its decision, and furthermore,…”
Bhd. of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen, Gen. Comm. of Adjustment, W. Lines v. Union Pac. R.R. Co. (N.D. Ill. 2018). “2 The Union glosses over the fact that the Railroad become aware of Andrade’s nolo contendere plea before it denied his appeal of his 2Similarly, the other cited regulations provide generally that the parties should prepare their submissions to the Board such that the “pertinent…”
— 29 C.F.R. § 301.6(c) — 2 cases
J. W. Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco R.R. Co., 361 F.2d 946 (1st Cir. 1966). “" 29 CFR 301.6(c). 5 The Adjustment Board's opinion and award, rendered on December 14, 1961, framed these issues as follows: "In order to sustain the claim we must find that the carrier acted arbitrarily and without sufficient evidence to sustain its decision, and furthermore,…”
Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco R.R., 361 F.2d 946 (7th Cir. 1966). “” 29 CFR 301.6(c). . The Adjustment Board’s opinion and award, rendered on December 14, 1961, framed these issues as follows: “In order to sustain the claim we must find that the carrier acted arbitrarily and without sufficient evidence to sustain its decision, and furthermore,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.