29 C.F.R. § 4.132

Services and other items to be furnished under a single contract

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If the principal purpose of a contract is to furnish services through the use of service employees within the meaning of the Act, the contract to furnish such services is not removed from the Act's coverage merely because, as a matter of convenience in procurement, the service specifications are combined in a single contract document with specifications for the procurement of different or unrelated items. In such case, the Act would apply to service specifications but would not apply to any specifications subject to the Walsh-Healey Act or to the Davis-Bacon Act. With respect to contracts which contain separate specifications for the furnishing of services and construction activity, see § 4.116(c).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1984 · leading case: AFL-CIO v. Donovan, 582 F. Supp. 1015 (D.D.C. 1984).
AFL-CIO v. Donovan, 582 F. Supp. 1015 (D.D.C. 1984). “Compare 29 C.F.R. § 4.132 (1968) with 29 C.F.R. § 4.”
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Donovan, 582 F. Supp. 1015 (D.D.C. 1984). “Compare 29 C.F.R. § 4.132 (1968) with 29 C.F.R. § 4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.